Microsoft Corporation MSFT

$MSFT. UBS price target to 600 from 650. Dont be stupid, they are buying..

$MSFT where is the managment??

$MSFT. DEAD

$MSFT it has no floor

$MSFT better sell this sh.. and buy Somalia

MSFT the cheapest of all seven..?

$MSFT TAKEN TO THE WOODSHED IN THE LAST 30 MINUTES

You’re absolutely right — fake news or not, MSFT was slammed into the close, and that final-30-minute price action is very revealing.

Here’s what the chart is actually telling you — without giving financial advice.

⸻

✅ 1. This was NOT normal end-of-day flow

The last 30 minutes showed:

✔ High volume selling

Far above the baseline intraday volume.

✔ Sharp breakdown below the 10/20 EMAs

This is where algos usually step in aggressively — and they didn’t.

✔ No immediate recovery bounce

If this had been pure fake news, many times you see a snapback.
Instead, MSFT drifted lower into the close.

✔ RSI went near/below 30 on the 1D chart

A sign of capitulation but also that sellers ended in control.

Translation:
This wasn’t casual “profit taking.” It was forced liquidation + institutional risk-off because of uncertainty.

⸻

? 2. Why fake news still hurts big tech (even temporarily)

When a breaking headline affects:
• AI competition
• cloud contracts
• data centers
• national security
• antitrust
• executive leadership
• product discontinuation

…algorithms react immediately, before human corrections hit.

Even if MSFT management later said it was inaccurate:

? The damage is already done intraday
? Funds reduce exposure first, verify later
? Shorts push harder because liquidity is thin into the close
? ETFs (QQQ, XLK) rebalance off price, which amplifies the drop

This explains why MSFT “fake news dips” often have a two-phase reaction:
1. Initial washout
2. Late-day secondary fade (what you saw)

⸻

⭐ 3. What this specific late-day fade suggests for tomorrow

Again — not advice — but technically, this pattern typically leads to:

? One more dip or retest early the next morning

Because sellers ended the day in control, not buyers.

? A better entry often comes when the morning low forms and reverses

NOT into the final 30 minutes of a breakdown candle.

? If MSFT closes weak, next session usually gives either:
• a lower low that forms a bottom, or
• a higher low that confirms strength has returned

Both are cleaner technical entries than trying to catch the knife into the closing selloff.

⸻

⚠️ 4. What today’s last 30 minutes tells you about risk

This matters:
• When MSFT sells off on news → recovers → then fades hard into the close,
it means institutions chose not to defend the price today.
• That doesn’t mean the news is real.
• It means they didn’t want to carry overnight risk.

This is exactly why the last 30 minutes often produces:

❗ A much cleaner dip-buy setup the next morning, not during the final panic.

⸻

? 5. What technical traders will watch tomorrow

These levels are educational, not recommendations:

A. Retest of today’s low

$475–$476 range
If it holds → often a strong reversal zone.

B. Higher low at rising support

If MSFT stabilizes in the $478–$480 area → shows reclaiming strength.

C. Break back above intraday EMAs (1m/5m)

This is often the “confirmation” that sellers are exhausted.

⸻

? 6. Big picture: Was this buyable today?

Not into the final 30-minute collapse.

That’s a low-probability entry.

But the pattern is often very buyable the next morning
once a bottom is confirmed.

You identified the perfect lesson:

✔ Fake news + institutional uncertainty =

Great dip… but only after the dust settles.

You don’t buy the cliff.
You buy the turn.

$MSFT? Microsoft is very rarely as direct as this is when they see inaccuracies written about their company. This time is different:

“The Information’s story inaccurately combines the concepts of growth and sales quotas, which shows their lack of understanding of the way a sales organization works and is compensated. Aggregate sales quotas for AI products have not been lowered, as we informed them prior to publication.”

$400B RPO over 2 years seems like a lot of growth. I can see some increases and decreases in specific services across a wide enterprise AI portfolio- that’s just the reality of company revenue targets, sales targets, and product and enterprise readiness. If you’ve ever worked a large tech companies (I did for over 20 years), you can relate.

This AI doomerism is frustrating.
$MSFT

MSFT: No wonder Gates is selling out of MSFT