Danaos Corporation DAC

Set alert

Price alert · DAC

All alert types
153.96 USD -3.06 -1.95%

At close · Nov 2

153.96 0.00 0.00%

After hours · Nov 2, 4:00 PM ET

Bid
153.81 × 100
Ask
154.50 × 500
153.39 Day range 156.55
89.07 52-week range 172.76
YTD
+63.47%
1 year
+69.17%
Open
157.04
Prev close
157.02
Mkt cap
2.80B
Vol
235.12K
Avg vol
140.42K
EPS
29.55
P/E
5.21
Div yield
2.55%
More statistics
Low
153.39
High
156.55
Forward P/E
6.29
Beta
0.93
Short ratio
9.43
Inst. own
22.08%
Dividend
4.00
Ex-div date
Oct 12, 2026
Earnings
Nov 9, 2026
50-d avg
157.75
200-d avg
130.70
1y target
164.50

MAX chart

Chart tools
Interval

Events in this range
  • May 2, 2007Dividend: 0.44
  • Aug 1, 2007Dividend: 0.44
  • Aug 4, 2008Dividend: 0.465
  • Nov 3, 2008Dividend: 0.465
  • May 2, 2019Split: 1 for 14
  • Aug 4, 2025Earnings: 6.36; estimate 6.52; surprise -2.45%
  • Aug 5, 2025Rating: Jefferies · Buy → Buy
  • Dec 2, 2025Dividend: 0.9
  • Aug 3, 2026Earnings: 7.29; estimate 6.8; surprise 7.21%
  • Aug 6, 2026Rating: Freedom Broker · Hold → Buy
Signals (60)
NameDateAgo
RSI: OverboughtApr 1, 20267 months ago
RSI: OverboughtFeb 1, 20269 months ago
MACD: Buy SignalJul 1, 20251 year ago
SMA: BullishMay 1, 20251 year ago
MACD: Sell SignalDec 1, 20241 year ago
SMA: BearishOct 1, 20242 years ago
RSI: OverboughtMay 1, 20242 years ago
MACD: Buy SignalDec 1, 20232 years ago
SMA: BullishNov 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BearishAug 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BullishJun 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BullishMay 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BearishFeb 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BullishJan 1, 20233 years ago
SMA: BearishDec 1, 20223 years ago
MACD: Sell SignalJun 1, 20224 years ago
SMA: BearishApr 1, 20224 years ago
RSI: OverboughtJan 1, 20224 years ago
RSI: OverboughtFeb 1, 20215 years ago
SMA: BullishNov 1, 20206 years ago
SMA: BullishSep 1, 20206 years ago
SMA: BearishSep 1, 20188 years ago
SMA: BullishMay 1, 20188 years ago
MACD: Buy SignalDec 1, 20178 years ago
SMA: BearishJan 1, 201610 years ago
SMA: BearishNov 1, 201511 years ago
SMA: BullishSep 1, 201511 years ago
SMA: BearishAug 1, 201511 years ago
MACD: Sell SignalAug 1, 201511 years ago
MACD: Buy SignalMar 1, 201511 years ago
SMA: BullishFeb 1, 201511 years ago
MACD: Sell SignalDec 1, 201411 years ago
SMA: BearishAug 1, 201412 years ago
SMA: BullishNov 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BullishOct 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BearishSep 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BearishSep 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BullishMar 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BullishMar 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BearishFeb 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BullishJan 1, 201313 years ago
SMA: BearishAug 1, 201214 years ago
SMA: BullishFeb 1, 201214 years ago
SMA: BearishJul 1, 201115 years ago
SMA: BearishJul 1, 201115 years ago
SMA: BullishFeb 1, 201115 years ago
SMA: BullishJan 1, 201115 years ago
SMA: BearishNov 1, 201016 years ago
SMA: BullishSep 1, 201016 years ago
SMA: BearishMay 1, 201016 years ago
SMA: BullishMar 1, 201016 years ago
SMA: BearishFeb 1, 201016 years ago
SMA: BullishNov 1, 200917 years ago
SMA: BearishOct 1, 200917 years ago
SMA: BullishSep 1, 200917 years ago
MACD: Buy SignalSep 1, 200917 years ago
RSI: OversoldJun 1, 200917 years ago
RSI: OversoldFeb 1, 200917 years ago
RSI: OversoldNov 1, 200818 years ago
SMA: BearishNov 1, 200719 years ago

Discussion (10)

Sign in to join the discussion

Don Yacob DAC 3 years ago #2

Seems like the containership firms are taking a fiscally conservative approach, given overall market and current macro set up - I think its respectable and I will not make any assumptions today, I will base it on their moves as we get move closer to the large guaranteed cashflow cycle ending late

Don Yacob DAC 3 years ago #3

And here…. We…. Go

Don Yacob DAC 3 years ago #4

ER tomorrow after close

Don Yacob DAC 3 years ago #5

Good question Kristyian! It’s just a matter of time

gearhead_In_LA DAC 4 years ago #9

$DAC $GRIN $ZIM $GOGL $SBLK are among my holdings.
Thoughts on whether and to what extent share prices will be affected by the new the Ocean Shipping Reform Act that requires the Federal Maritime Commission to investigate complaints about late fees charged by ocean carriers and terminals. It also bars them from unreasonably refusing cargo space for U.S. shipments— and presumably they would only do this if they calculate it would cost them more than they could earn by collecting and carrying said cargo, right?

gearhead_In_LA DAC 4 years ago #10

I am no kid. I remember the recessions of the 70s and 80s all too well. And despite this, it’s entirely irrational, and stinks of hedge fund fuckery, that $DAC could deliver such tremendously successful numbers and then find their SP dip a few %points. They should be way up in a well-deserved fat green +++ 3-5% (at a minimum) this morning. *SHOULD. Do we need more regulation? Business success should always be reflected in SP value. It oughta be as rational as are the components of tuning a successful business: smart planning, creative/resourceful actions, positive balance of short and long range planning…generally accepted good business practices, facing and at least matching competition, maintaining and/or building a moat, and a bit of luck. $DAC has been and done ALL this… and yet here we are. ?