FTX Token FTT.X
Nov 13, 2026, 5:59 PM EST
- YTD
- -52.99%
- 1 year
- -69.98%
Discussion (271)
Sign in to join the discussion
$FTT.X DONT GO TO STANFORD LAW
$FTT.X DO NOT GO TO BAHAMAS!! If you travel don’t spend money and, if you do, wreck every place YOU STAY!!!!!!
$FTT.X hacked FTX site to payoff Bahamian’s and SBF’s family buying $125 MM USD in real estate…. Way better places to go in the USA, Caribbean and Mexico… well thought out scam by SBF and his cohorts… payoffs … blah blah blah… DO NOT TOUCh anything affiliated with SBF family… Albany in the Bahamas comes up … to rent and don’t buy
$FTT.X. BOYCOTT the BAHAMAS!!!
ftt.X cannot understand how any public/government pension plan would come to a risk assessment that crypto offers retirement grade investments; especially unregulated investments
$FTT.X seems that FTX had big names in Hollywood, sports and politics on its payroll to endorse its products/companies to advertise and gain public trust…lesson is never believe endorsements in financial related products and companies without reading and understanding the details…anything as unclear should be seen as unknown/extreme risk level
$FTT.X. He isn’t welcome to the orgy…. Duuudzzzz that’s diaper… crapping in the pool
$FTT.X. 4 % is nothing new on borrowing rates … it’s to be MF’N expected…Negative rates.. and low near zero rates don’t make MF’N for commerce, business and growth expectations. I would expect the central banks will maintain 3-4%FED Funds for many years… those DCF models are poorly designed and so antiquated as the Quakers !!!
$FTT.X it’s was supposed to be:: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Satoshi Nakamoto satoshin@gmx.com www.bitcoin.org
Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
$FTT.X. Cero!!!
