Day Gain | ||
Gain | ||
Market Val | ||
Costs | ||
Cash | ||
Portfolio | ||
Realized | ||
Dividend |
Date | For | Estimate | Reported | Surprise | surprise % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019-11-13 | 2019-09 | -0.37 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
2019-08-14 | 2019-06 | -0.44 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
-
Get in while itβs $TILL LOW
-
-
Makes me happy for the moment
-
-
I have 11,000 shares at 2.23 fuck this company
-
Keep positive folks, hold what you have! Up , up and away
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
If you havent considered $LK as a long term (15-90 day) investment, you might want to reconsider. Everybody cooks their books, in some way, no matter how trivial. If you were an upstart like Luckin, you might even be tempted to fudge some things to look appealing to investors. Even still, the guilty parties are GONE.
That aside, as the pictures show, they ARE legit. And, IMO, their stores look nicer than Starbucks - BY FAR!
SO, you have to ask yourself, would Starbucks BENEFIT from the PRIME location of Luckin stores? Odds are, Starbucks doesnt have locations that are BETTER than Luckins. And, to add that many stores straight up would cost Starbucks a BOATLOAD of money. A buyout to get ready made stores, in PRIME locations, would cost them A LOT less!
-
-
The fraud is OLD news that is being given NEW LIFE by the Murdoch clan. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to connect the dots between the Murdochs and Starbucks. That is commonly referred to as stock MANIPULATION. And, I dont care about that. Read BETWEEN the lines. Why are they going thru all the trouble to bring the stock down?? It is SIMPLE. They will BENEFIT from an acquisition of Luckin, by Starbucks. You may try to infer they wont, who cares? BUT, they WILL.
WHY should YOU care?? BECAUSE, once Luckin PRs that they are in BUYOUT talks with Starbucks, this stock is going to SKYROCKET.
Conspiracy Theory??? We shall SEE.
-
Is Rupert Murdoch Blue Horseshoe?
'The WSJ just did an amazing piece on the fraud at $LK. Wow. It is EXACTLY what we are seeing at $GSX. Citron has been forwarding all new materials to SEC. No reason to allow $GSX to cover up. July 9, 2020 is the day they cannot avoid.' -Citron
[re: The HIT piece]As you likely know, Rupert Murdoch owns WSJ. Turns out, Ruperts son, Lachlan has passive ownership in Starbucks, via one of his investment companies. See if you can follow the bouncing ball:
Vivaldi Opportunities Fund / VAM / Vivaldi Opportunities Fund N-PX - - N-PX
2019-08-29 - Murdoch Yes For With Management Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. FOXA 90130A101 11/14/2018 Elect Director Lachlan K. Murdoch Yes For With Management Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. Murdoch Yes For With Management Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. FOXA 90130A101 11/14/2018 Elect Director Lachlan KVivaldi has a stake in Luxfer:
https://fintel.io/doc/sec/1703117/000114420419042352/tv527799_npx.htm
Luxfer has a stake in BlackRock:
https://fintel.io/doc/sec-lxfr-luxfer-holdings-blackrock-inc-sc-13g-2020-february-07-18342
Guess who the 2nd largest institutional owner is in Starbucks???
2020-02-06 13G BlackRock Inc. 80,676,639 6.80
ONE more thing to consider. Trump and Murdoch have a tit for tat thing going. Is this Luckin Starbucks thing behind the Trump admins push to delist Chinese stocks?
It certainly would not be in Starbucks BEST interest to pay FULL price for LK, would it? And, ANYTHING that benefits his investment companies benefits Lachlan Murdoch (albeit indirectly). BUT, the BENEFIT is still there.
-
-
-