Helius Medical Tech Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Helius Medical Tech (NASDAQ:HSDT) reported third-quarter financial results on Wednesday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.

This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation.

View the webcast at https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/p6egt6xf/

Summary

Helius Medical Technologies Inc reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $3.4 million, driven by $3.3 million from staking activities, marking a significant increase from previous periods.

The company completed a $15 million registered direct offering and used proceeds to acquire approximately 125,000 SOL, reinforcing its strategy of increasing SOL per share.

Operationally, the company transitioned its Pacific Backbone infrastructure to operation, securing 1 million SOL in third-party stake by quarter-end, contributing to revenue.

Helius is expanding its footprint with plans to establish a headquarters in Hong Kong following its designation as a strategic enterprise by the Hong Kong SAR Government.

Management highlighted the growth in Solana’s ecosystem, noting significant institutional adoption in Asia-Pacific and technological upgrades that improve scalability and transaction speed.

Full Transcript

OPERATOR

Good afternoon everyone and thank you for participating in today’s conference call to discuss Helius Medical Tech’s operating results for the third quarter of 2026 ended September 30, 2026. The third quarter 2026 earnings press release was issued today, November 11th at approximately 4:25 pm Eastern Time and is available in the Investor Relations section of Helius Medical Tech’s website. Joining us today are Joseph Chi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Cosmo Jiang, Director, and Madeline Gani, Chief Financial Officer. All participants are in listen-only mode. Following management’s prepared remarks, we will open the call for questions. To ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone keypad. Today’s call is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the call over to Jake Marakis with M Group Strategic Communications for introductory comments. Please go ahead.

Jake Marakis

Thank you, operator. Before we begin, I would like to inform you that comments and responses to questions during today’s call reflect management’s views as of today, November 11, 2026 only and include forward-looking statements and opinion statements including predictions, estimates, plans, expectations, and other similar information. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of certain risks and uncertainties.

These risks and uncertainties are more fully described in our press release issued today, in the sections entitled Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 31, 2026, and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as in subsequent filings with the SEC. Our SEC filings can be found on our website or on the SEC’s website. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

We disclaim any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. Please note that this conference call will be available for audio replay on our website under the News and Events section of our Investor Relations page. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Joseph G.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Thank you, Jake. Good afternoon everyone. Welcome to Helius Medical Tech’s third quarter 2026 earnings call. On our Q1 call earlier this year, I introduced Helius Medical Tech’s self-reinforcing flywheel. On our Q2 call I said we have reinforced the flywheel, validated cluster live in Tokyo, third-party stake secured, and put the legacy business behind us. The third quarter is when the flywheel started to turn. This integrated strategy is now beginning to bear fruit. Our third quarter operating costs reached our lowest level yet, below that of Q1, as we continue to streamline operations while simultaneously executing our dynamic treasury management plan.

Cosmo and Bedi will share the details of those achievements in their respective areas. Three developments defined the quarter. First, our Pacific Backbone infrastructure moved from buildout to operation. Third-party stake on our Tokyo validator reached 1 million SOL at quarter end and, as we had anticipated, began contributing to our revenue in the third quarter. Second, as SOL price rallied and our discount in the asset narrowed, we put the other side of the capital toolkit to work. On September 30, we priced an approximately 15 million registered direct offering with a global institutional investor at a 5% premium to net asset value per share at 3.43 per share.

The offering closed on October 1. We subsequently used the proceeds from the offering to purchase approximately 125,000 SOL in support of our commitment to put more SOL behind every share. Third, our treasury continued to work for shareholders as well. Staking rewards attributed to our treasury holdings and validator operation contributed to 3.3 million revenue on 30,767 SOL earned in the third quarter, further bolstering our treasury and compounding returns.

Before I detail the company’s business operation for the quarter, I would like to take a moment to touch on developments in the Solana ecosystem. The third quarter was another strong period for institutional adoption of Solana, and much of that momentum came from Asia Pacific. Tokenization continued to accelerate. Solana’s on-chain real-world asset market set a new all-time high of approximately 3.7 billion in July, surpassed 4 billion in August, and climbed above 4.6 billion by late September.

In July, tokenized SK Hynix shares went live on Solana on the same day the Korean chip maker debuted on Nasdaq, giving eligible investors around the world 24/7 on-chain access to one of Asia’s largest technology companies. Asia Pacific institutions moved decisively. In Japan, SBI Holdings formed a strategic partnership with the Solana Foundation focused on yen stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets, and cross-border payments, and SBI Global Asset Management and DGFT launched the JX Token for on-chain access to a Japanese equity fund strategy. In Korea, Shinhan Asset Management, which oversees approximately 97 billion, signed an MOU with the Solana Foundation for a won-denominated tokenized fund, and payment processor CareNet agreed to bring Solana Pay to more than 330,000 merchants.

In September, Project Harmonia was announced to connect Allfunds’ distribution network of more than 3,300 asset managers and financial institutions with Solana. Regulated access to SOL also widened. Morgan Stanley Investment Management launched a Solana trust that intends to stake and pass rewards through to investors. E*TRADE added spot SOL trading. Charles Schwab announced plans to add SOL. And the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF became the first U.S. Solana ETF sold to surpass 1 billion in assets.

In Japan, the National Diet, which is the national parliament of Japan, reclassified crypto assets as financial instruments, laying the legal foundation for spot crypto ETFs. The network itself kept improving. Block capacity rose 66%, block times fell from 400 to 200 milliseconds, and Alpenglow, the most significant upgrade to Solana’s consensus protocol since launch, went live on October 21st with the goal of cutting transaction finality from roughly 12.8 seconds to about 150 milliseconds. We believe that is the performance that institutional involvement in the ecosystem requires. Each of these developments helps to expand institutional interest in Solana and the market opportunity for Helius Medical Tech to serve as a trusted provider of advisory, staking, and validation services across the ecosystem.

The third quarter also brought Solana’s first on-chain governance vote, and we were proud to participate directly as a validator operator and as one of the largest publicly listed holders of SOL. We believe we have a responsibility to participate and to do so transparently. We published our positions in advance so that our delegators could vote with full knowledge of the operator’s view. We voted for SGP0001, the Solana Constitution, which passed with broad support.

We voted against SGP0002 and SGP0003 not because we oppose their long-term goals, but because we believe established network economics should not change during the first live governance cycle. Stake-weighted governance worked as intended and provides long-term stakers like us a direct voice in the network we are building on. As I committed to last quarter, I’ll update you on each of our three service lines every quarter. First, Advisory Services. We provide bespoke advisory for traditional financial institutions and corporations, helping them unlock tangible business value through blockchain adoption. During the quarter, our team held over 40 institutional education sessions and workshops with banks, asset managers, and exchanges across Asia Pacific, and we continue to see increasing enthusiasm around exploring new use cases of tokenization and stablecoin transactions.

We also continue to make the case for institutional Solana adoption in public. In August I spoke at the HSBC Asia Fintech Summit, at Cyber Asia in Hong Kong, and in September at Solana Summit Korea in Seoul. One point I made at HSBC bears repeating here: we believe tokenization works best when it starts with assets that already have deep liquidity and real demand and expands outward from there. That is how we advise our clients, and the reason we believe institutions coming on-chain in our region are starting with stablecoins, funds, and listed equities.

Second, Validator Infrastructure. Pacific Backbone is a compliant, high-performance infrastructure that we believe regulated institutions require in order to scale staking and validation on Solana. Last quarter we said we had secured third-party stake and expected to report validator results for the third quarter. As of September 30th, Pacific Backbone has been delegated approximately 1.3 million SOL of total stake, including 1 million delegated by third parties, and that has continued to grow since quarter end to approximately 1.5 million SOL of total stake as of November 3rd.

This is what we have been working toward. Institutions are moving real size onto infrastructure operated by a name-listed, regulated entity, and that stake is now producing recurring fee-based revenue. Beyond our own treasury, our Tokyo cluster continues to run on three machines operating as a single validator, providing us redundancy and an independent test environment ahead of each new deployment. Beyond Tokyo, we are assessing Hong Kong as our next location.

We are also pursuing ISO 27001 certification, which we are targeting for the fourth quarter of 2026. Finally, the platform business. Our AI-powered orchestration and compliance stack remains a long-term build. When complete, it is expected to bring our staking, validation, and advisory lines together, giving partners a single point of execution across their digital asset operations. These three service lines feed one another: advisory identifies where institutions need infrastructure; infrastructure generates recurring fee revenue that is uncorrelated; NAV that revenue recycles into SOL accumulation. A larger, better-run treasury is what we believe makes us a more credible counterparty for the next institutions exploring Solana infrastructure. In the third quarter that loop began producing revenue.

Building on that foundation, we were recently selected by the Hong Kong SAR Government Office for Attracting Strategic Enterprises, OASIS, as a strategic enterprise, the only digital asset infrastructure company to receive that designation in 2026. As part of the partnership we are expecting to establish a headquarters in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is now where Asia’s institutions are coming on-chain, and we intend to be there building alongside them. With that, let me hand over the call to Cosmo to walk through our treasury and capital markets results.

Cosmo Jiang (Director)

Thanks, Joseph. Hello everyone. Last quarter I said execution had surpassed scale as the key differentiator amongst digital asset treasury companies. The third quarter tested that view from a different direction. After declines in each of the first two quarters, SOL rose approximately 60% during the third quarter from roughly $74 to roughly $118. Institutional channels into SOL also broadened U.S. spot. Solana ETFs recorded 11 consecutive weeks of inflows and major investing and wealth management platforms added SOL access.

We welcome the expanded access to SOL for investors, but we believe the value proposition of Solana Company remains fundamentally advantageous to holding SOL via an ETF or a brokerage account. An ETF or brokerage gives you SOL. We aim to give you more SOL per share over time through staking yield above the network average, accretive capital allocation on both sides, and operating businesses that generate revenue independent of the SOL price. Moving on to staking performance. Net staking yield is the annualized yield we realized on our staked SOL after validator commissions and related operating costs compared against the Solana Network’s system-wide average over the same period. For the third quarter of 2026, our average net staking yield attributable to our treasury holdings was 5.9% APY, compared with a network average of approximately 4.9% APY, representing outperformance of 100 basis points.

That yield comes from careful validator selection, active MEV capture, and continuous rebalancing. Staking rewards are automatically restaked to compound returns, producing consistent daily on-chain revenue. A portion of our treasury is now staked to our own Pacific Backbone validator. As we have translated our learnings from third parties to boosting our internal performance, our capital allocation framework has not changed: issue only at a premium to net asset value, repurchase only at a discount, and judge every decision by whether it adds SOL per share.

At the start of the quarter, our shares traded below NAV and we continued to repurchase under our previously authorized stock repurchase program. During the third quarter we repurchased 1.4 million shares at a discount to NAV, at an average price of $1.96 per share for approximately $2.8 million, bringing year-to-date repurchases to approximately $8.7 million. As SOL recovered and our discount to NAV narrowed, the opportunity changed. On September 30, we priced a registered direct offering with a global institutional investor of 4,369,356 shares at $3.433 per share, a 5% premium to net asset value per share, which offering closed on October 1st. The investor also received warrants to purchase an equal number of shares at an exercise price of $3.776 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $15 million and net proceeds of approximately $14.3 million. We used those proceeds to purchase approximately 125,000 SOL. We believe being able to act on both sides of the capital structure as conditions change is one of the most powerful tools we have for creating shareholder value, with each action being accretive to SOL per share.

As of September 30, 2026, Solana Company held approximately 2.4 million SOL across all categories including liquid holdings, staked positions, and receivables, with a fair value of approximately $288 million, approximately $1.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, approximately $1 million of cash receivables, and a $15 million payable for unsettled SOL purchases. Our diluted share count on a Treasury stock method basis was approximately 85.2 million shares, including common shares outstanding, in-the-money warrants, and in-the-money stock options and RSUs.

That equates to 0.0274 SOL per Treasury stock method diluted share after adjusting for unsettled SOL purchases and assumed conversion of cash and cash equivalents and cash receivables to SOL. I will now turn the call over to Madeline Gani, our Chief Financial Officer, for the detailed financial results.

Madeline Gani (Chief Financial Officer)

Thank you, Cosmo. Third quarter revenue was $3.4 million, consisting of $3.3 million of staking revenue, which includes rewards on our treasury and revenue from third-party stake on Pacific Backbone, and $23,000 of other revenue. This compares with $697,000 in the third quarter of 2025 and $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2026. For the first nine months of 2026, revenue was $9.5 million, comprising $9.3 million of staking revenue, which includes rewards on our treasury and revenue from third-party stake on Pacific Backbone, and $241,000 of other revenue, compared with $789,000 in the prior year period.

Cost of revenue for the third quarter was $617,000, resulting in gross profit of $2.7 million, or a gross margin of approximately 82%. For the first nine months, cost of revenue was $874,000 and gross profit was $8.6 million. General and administrative expenses for the third quarter were $3.4 million compared with $11.1 million in the second quarter, which included approximately $6.8 million of non-recurring severance associated with the Ponds divestiture, and approximately $5.2 million in the first quarter.

For the first nine months, general and administrative expenses were $19.7 million. Last quarter we said we expected G&A to decline and normalize towards first quarter levels as the Ponds cost basis came out in full. Third quarter G&A came in below first quarter levels and includes $0.6 million of non-cash stock-based compensation. Turning over to digital asset fair value movements, during the quarter we recorded an unrealized gain on digital assets and digital asset receivables of $102.7 million, reflecting the recovery in the SOL price; a realized loss on digital assets of $1.1 million; and an unrealized gain on our digital asset fund investment of $1.3 million. For the first nine months, those figures were $15.9 million, $33.5 million, and $6 million, respectively. As a reminder, these fair value movements are non-cash under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

They do not affect our cash balance, the tokens earned from staking activities, or the quantity of SOL we hold. Income from operations was $103.9 million for the third quarter, compared with a loss of $32.7 million in the second quarter. For the first nine months, loss from operations was $28.4 million. Non-operating income, net, was $1.3 million for the quarter, including a $1.7 million gain from the change in fair value of our derivative liability, partially offset by other expenses of $0.4 million, which relates primarily to our investment in a licensed Hong Kong trust company.

We reported net income for the third quarter of 2026 of $105.2 million. This compares with a net loss of $352.8 million in the third quarter of 2025. For the first nine months, net loss was $24.9 million. This compares with a net loss of $366.4 million in the first nine months of 2025. Turning over to the balance sheet, as of September 30, 2026, we had total assets of $292.6 million, including $1.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $21 million of current digital assets, $14.8 million of digital assets receivable from broker, and $252.4 million of long-term digital assets and digital asset exposure across staked positions, restricted assets, receivables, and fund investments. Total liabilities were $19.1 million, including a derivative liability of $2.5 million, and total stockholders’ and mezzanine equity was $273.6 million.

As of September 30th, treasury stock stood at $8.7 million, representing 4.4 million shares at cost, compared with $5.9 million and 2.9 million shares at June 30th. Subsequent to quarter end, on October 1st, we closed the registered direct offering Cosmo described, issuing 4,369,356 shares and an equal number of warrants for gross proceeds of approximately $15 million and net proceeds of approximately $14.3 million. We also repurchased 1,957,525 shares for $4.4 million. I will now hand it back to Joseph for closing remarks.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Thank you, Madeline, and thank you all for joining Solana’s third quarter 2026 operating results update. This was a milestone quarter for Solana Company as our strategic vision for the integrated flywheel took root and began contributing to revenue. We also continue to advance and deliver on our commitments from the prior quarter. We said we expected to scale Pacific Backbone and recognize our first validator-related rewards in the third quarter.

Third-party stake on Pacific Backbone is live and now contributing to our staking revenue. We said we would continue to execute our capital allocation strategy. We repurchased stock when it traded below NAV, and when we had the opportunity to raise capital at a premium to NAV, we took it. Both actions serve the same goal: more SOL behind every share. We intend to continue that positive momentum. Three priorities will define our fourth quarter. First, we plan to grow Pacific Backbone third-party stake, complete our assessment of Hong Kong as our next validator location, and work towards ISO 27001 certification. Second, we plan to use our planned new regional headquarters in Hong Kong to bring more institutions onto Solana and grow our staking offering. Third, we plan to keep compounding SOL per share, having already deployed the proceeds into SOL with the same discipline we have applied all year.

We look forward to updating shareholders on our progress in the quarters ahead. Operator, please open the call for questions.

OPERATOR

Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone. You’ll hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. We also ask that you please wait for your name and company to be announced before proceeding with your question. One moment while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question is coming from the line of Fedor Chabayan of B. Riley. Please go ahead.

Fedor Chabayan (Analyst)

Thank you very much, operator, and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for the update and thanks for taking my question. My first one is, could you break down the 100 bps outperformance that was recorded in third quarter? Like specifically, how much comes from validator commission you keep on your own stake, and how much from maybe MEV and data tips and priority fees, and how much from uptime and vote credit performance at Pacific Backbone, if it is?

Thank you.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Hey Fedor, thanks for the questions. That’s a detailed fee breakdown. Mehdi, do you have the detail?

Mehdi

I don’t have it handy right now and happy to follow up on that. But essentially, during—for the $3.4 million of revenue, we have $31,000 of staking rewards, of which approximately 29,000 units pertain to our individual SOL and the rest from third party.

Fedor Chabayan (Analyst)

Okay, thank you. And maybe on follow-up on this, on sustainability of this outperformance, should we think that this spread is durable going forward?

Mehdi

So, one more time, what’s durable at all?

Fedor Chabayan (Analyst)

This outperformance versus generic Solana staking yield.

Mehdi

Okay, you’re talking about how we manage our own Solana with third party. Are you talking about the Solana we are staking with our network?

Fedor Chabayan (Analyst)

Yeah, I just want to figure out if it’s fair to assume that your outperformance with 1%—is it a fair assumption to keep it going forward for future periods, or if it’s kind of, it depends on many things.

Mehdi

Fedor, I think—I guess we’re not providing a forward-looking statement here. I think if you look at our performance the last three quarters, we’ve been managing our SOL inventory quite well with all the staking partners that provide services to us. The best person to talk about it is probably Cosmo. But I would think that the way we’re managing it with third party is still going to continue, and I would think that we should be able to continue to outperform.

As for the SOL that’s been staked on our own validator infrastructure after the beta, we can see the performance getting better and better. I think we are doing quite well. Maybe I should stop here and see if Cosmo has anything to add.

Fedor Chabayan (Analyst)

Okay, thank you.

Cosmo Jiang (Director)

Can you hear me? Sorry.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Yeah, go ahead. Sorry.

Cosmo Jiang (Director)

Oh yeah, yeah. I think you can look at our track record from the last three quarters as a good directional. Directionally, we have been able to perform pretty consistently above the benchmark. There are a number of things that go into that. One of them is validator selection. There is a fair amount of dispersion amongst the validators, and we tend—there are certain customizations that we can agree to with our validators to get to these higher yields.

I’d say that the other factor that’s within our control is our ability to leverage our strong relationships and alliances with these validators to get differentiated economics that they may not offer to other parties. Both those I think are pretty durable. I think some things that are less controllable, and we’ll see, is that the staking economics on Solana do change over time. Recently, with Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade, there have been some changes to the amount of additional rewards that go to leaders, and that’s created a lot more volatility in the stream of validator rewards. And so that is one consideration, and so there may be a little bit more randomness going forward.

And then the other consideration is that, you know, there have been major upgrades across one of the large validator clients recently that had been lagging for a while. And so that validator client has now come back to parity with some of the other major validator clients. And so it’s possible the average is getting pulled up because some people are catching up in their techniques that other people had. And when there’s less dispersion amongst validators, then inherently, if we’re picking the best, but other people are catching up to the best, the gap may also close a little bit.

So we’re seeing some of those impacts this quarter. But these are things that do vary over time, and there are constantly new techniques that are being innovated. And so we anticipate that we should be able to maintain some performance gap. But that gap might be volatile quarter to quarter. Yeah, look, what we’ve been seeing is that blockchain activity tends to have some reflexivity to asset prices. And so as asset prices come down, we do see activity tend to trend down. And this past quarter, when we saw activity pick up again, transaction fees did also pick up on Solana.

We also saw the growth of real-world assets, and in particular tokenized equities, over this last quarter really grow across blockchains in general, but also on Solana. And that did lead to more transaction fees, which leads obviously to better economics for stakers, but also holders of Solana. And so we feel very optimistic on a number of these drivers continuing, including the idea of tokenized equities being traded more broadly across the world in larger volume and more DeFi applications getting involved and becoming these next-generation on-chain prime brokers to really even further enable tokenized equity to take off.

And then we have the advent of prediction markets that are being experimented on Solana, and certainly perpetual futures are also a big growth avenue for Solana. We’re hopeful that some of these, in addition to potentially new areas like collectibles trading and other things—collectibles trading, stablecoin transactions, payment volumes—may continue to increase on the Solana blockchain, and all that should result in higher transaction fees and higher economics for Solana owners.

I wanted to circle back actually on one of your questions on the staking yield. We were able to pull up the numbers of the 5.9% APY that we had in the quarter. Roughly 5.1% was inflationary rewards or emissions, roughly 50 basis points were block rewards, and roughly 20 basis points were MEV.

OPERATOR

Thank you. One moment for the next question. Our next question is coming from the line of Matthew Galenko of Maxim Group. Please go ahead.

Matthew Galenko (Analyst)

Hey, thanks for taking my questions. Maybe first, can we get some sense, directionally, of OPEX or how we might think OPEX moves in the fourth quarter or even into the first quarter, particularly as you’re signaling opening an office in Hong Kong and further build-out of your validator structure? So I’m just curious if directionally we should be moving up or even normalization towards that first-quarter level. Thanks.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Hey, good to see you online again, Matthew. Mehdi, do you want to take that question?

Mehdi

Sure, and thanks for asking that question, Matthew, as we don’t give any guidance on forward-looking OPEX. I think, in general, we continue to optimize for our G&A, but at the same time, as the business grows we would expect an increase in expenses. So to answer your question, we would probably normalize between what our current rate is and what our historic rate—so something in between.

Matthew Galenko (Analyst)

Okay, thank you. And maybe you provided a few numbers around your third-party staking volumes. Can you give us maybe just qualitatively—is the trajectory there in line or exceeding internal expectations, or how is that performing relative to what you were targeting? Thanks.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Thank you. I guess from my perspective, if you look at third-party SOL coming in, frankly that’s above our expectation. The whole infrastructure only came online in July as some beta, and if you look at it, I guess the external delegation only started very late July—I think like July 31st—and then started with a few hundred thousand, and we thought it would take, because we haven’t even started marketing very aggressively because of the beta phase.

And then it actually went up a lot quicker than we thought. I think, again, this could be—now that we are going through building another node in Hong Kong and then we are going through the ISO certification and getting close to the end of the year—I am being, let’s say, if I want to be prudent, I think that the kind of growth rate we’re seeing in this third party, so going from 300,000 to over a million of SOL, is probably going to slow down a bit in the fourth quarter. I don’t think it’s going to go from here on to 3 million by the end of the quarter.

This is an example. So let’s hope for the best, but I would think that by first quarter next year, when it comes back, as more and more adoption of Solana happens with the major financial institutions in the region, we’ll see more third parties come into our validator infrastructure.

Matthew Galenko (Analyst)

Great. Thank you.

OPERATOR

Thank you. And that does conclude today’s Q&A session. I would like to turn the call back over to Joseph for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Joseph G (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Great. Thank you. Well, thank you everyone for joining the call and also for the good questions. If you have any more questions, please write to us. We will respond. And if you want to have a separate meeting, discuss about anything, happy to arrange as well. Thank you very much.

OPERATOR

Thank you for joining today’s program. This does conclude today’s program and remarks. Thank you so much. You have a great day, and you may disconnect.

Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.