Amprius Technologies Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Amprius Technologies (NYSE:AMPX) reported third-quarter financial results on Wednesday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.

This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation.

View the webcast at https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=gW9ML2h3

Summary

Amprius Technologies reported record Q3 revenue of $39.1 million, up 83% year over year and 15% sequentially, driven by strong demand from aviation, defense, and advanced mobility customers.

The company raised its full-year 2026 revenue target to $145 million, marking the third consecutive quarter of increased outlook, supported by a rapidly growing order book and expanding contract manufacturer relationships.

Amprius introduced the SiCore 500, a new high energy density cell for aviation applications, and began shipping to new market segments including defense and maritime vehicles.

The company secured a $75 million contract from the U.S. Department of Defense to retrofit a battery production line, expected to significantly increase domestic production capacity by 2028.

Amprius continues to expand its capital-efficient production strategy through partnerships with manufacturers in the U.S., South Korea, and China, aiming for full NDAA compliance by 2027.

Management emphasized the robust growth outlook for the defense drone market and potential expansion into other sectors such as e-mobility and commercial drones.

The company maintains a strong financial position with $60.7 million in cash and no debt, while actively investing to support future growth and margin improvement.

Full Transcript

OPERATOR

Good morning and welcome to the Amprius Technologies third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Joining us for today’s presentation are the company’s CEO, Tom Stepien, and CFO, Ricardo Rodriguez. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following management’s remarks, we will open the call for questions. Please note that this presentation contains forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company’s financial and business performance, business strategy, future product development or commercialization, new customer adoption and new applications, the company’s growth and the growth of markets in which the company operates, and the timing and ability of Amprius to expand its manufacturing capacity, scale its business, and achieve a sustainable cost structure.

These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that may cause Amprius’ results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. For a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please refer to Amprius’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This presentation includes non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin.

Our non-GAAP financial measures do not replace the presentation of Amprius’ GAAP financial results and should only be used as a supplement to, not a substitute for, Amprius’ financial results presented in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to calculations of similarly titled measures by other companies. A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is included in our press release, a copy of which is furnished to the SEC and posted on our website.

Finally, I’d like to remind everyone that this conference call is being webcast. A recording will be made available for replay on the company’s investor relations website at ir.amprius.com. In addition to the webcast, the company has also posted a press release that accompanies these results, which can also be found on the Amprius investor relations website. Before turning the call over to management, I want to highlight a few near-term IR events. Amprius will be attending the Craig-Hallum conference on November 17th in New York and the B. Riley Conference in New York on December 2nd. We hope to connect with many of you at these upcoming events. I’ll now turn the call over to Amprius Technologies’ CEO, Tom Stepien, for his comments. Sir, please go ahead.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Welcome everyone and thank you for joining us this morning. Amprius Technologies continues to see strong demand for our energy-dense silicon anode lithium-ion batteries from a growing set of aviation, defense, and advanced mobility customers in the third quarter. That robust demand resulted in record revenue of $39.1 million, up 83% year over year and 15% sequentially, as shown on Slide 3. Our Q3 revenue represents an annualized run rate of over $156 million.

Given our double-digit revenue percentage increase in Q3, a rapidly growing order book, along with an expanding group of contract manufacturers that support our capital-light business model, we are raising our full-year 2026 revenue target to $145 million, up from at least $140 million. This is the third consecutive quarter that we have increased our outlook. We saw particular strength in North America this quarter, with revenue in the region up 2.3x compared to last year.

North America represented 31% of our business in Q3, up from 19% in Q2. Europe remains our largest market at nearly 60% of overall revenue. The third quarter was an eventful period for Amprius Technologies, which included product introductions, new manufacturing relationships, and a growing customer base. Let me touch on a few highlights. In September we introduced SiCore 500, a new 500 watt-hour-per-kilogram cell designed for long-endurance aviation applications. Previously, producing these extremely high energy density cells required custom manufacturing tools, specialized material-handling equipment and procedures, and non-standard cell designs. SiCore 500 is markedly different, designed for commercial lithium-ion processing equipment and standard cell formats, making it compatible with Amprius Technologies’ global contract manufacturing network.

We believe these new cells are ideal for the sustained low-rate discharge profiles required for high-altitude platform systems, or HAPS, as well as for fixed-wing drones and other long-endurance applications. In HAPS, stored energy and battery weight decide whether persistent stratospheric flight is possible. Solar-powered platforms charge the batteries during the day so that they can stay aloft through the night. Higher specific energy cells increase flight time, range, and payload without adding weight.

We plan to ship SiCore 500 cells to HAPS companies in the fourth quarter. They support extended-duration missions where platforms stay airborne in the stratosphere between 60 and 65,000 feet for weeks and months at a time. These systems provide broadband communications, bringing Internet access to remote areas. HAPS also enables Earth observation and environmental monitoring for tracking methane or other greenhouse gas emissions. For example, I want to highlight one of our European customers, Quantum Systems, a leading German developer of autonomous unmanned systems. Quantum is growing rapidly, attracting world-class investors and expanding its portfolio across air, land, and sea. Amprius Technologies has supplied silicon anode cells for Quantum’s Vector and Twister ISR platform for several years. We are proud that our technology helps deliver the endurance these missions demand.

Relationships like this one reflect the durability of our customer base and the growing role of high energy density cells in allied defense programs. In Q3, Amprius Technologies entered new market segments—defense and maritime vehicles. We began shipping SiCore cells to a leading European manufacturer of autonomous deep-sea underwater vehicles that operate at depths of more than 3,000 meters for commercial, scientific, and defense applications. These vehicles execute lengthy missions and are far away from any opportunity to recharge, so every watt-hour on board really matters. That makes them a natural fit for our high energy density silicon anode cells.

This is the first time SiCore technology has gone beneath the sea and we see it as a promising new avenue for growth. Let’s now turn to the supply side. In September, Amprius Technologies was selected for a competitive contract from the U.S. Department of Defense’s Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program to retrofit an existing domestic lithium-ion battery production line. The retrofit changes one portion of an existing factory, converting production from standard electric vehicle batteries to our advanced battery systems that power Group 1, 2, and 3 drones.

The contract totals $75 million, $22.3 million of which has been obligated. Our partner in this contract is a major South Korean battery manufacturer that operates the existing U.S. line today. At completion, expected in early 2028, we expect that the line will have the capacity to produce 12 million Amprius Technologies pouch cells annually. Importantly, these cells are aligned with the domestic sourcing requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act.

The conversion project is expected to cost approximately $100 million, including in-kind investments from Amprius Technologies. This project will significantly increase our ability to provide standardized NDAA-compliant high-performance pouch cells for key customers at scale. As you are aware, Amprius Technologies has chosen a capital-efficient production strategy. We have long worked with contract manufacturers in China and South Korea, and we have been expanding our work with partners in the United States. For instance, we recently entered into a contract manufacturing agreement with Caminus, a U.S.-based manufacturer of lithium-ion battery cells and electrodes, to build our pouch cells at its facility in Indianapolis.

The agreement spans the cell production process from partial assembly of Amprius Technologies-supplied components to full cell production and advances our development of a resilient NDAA-compliant supply chain. I want to reiterate that Amprius Technologies is shipping NDAA-compliant cells today, and we remain on track to reach full NDAA compliance with domestically produced cells in 2027. Please now turn to Slide 4. As the unmanned aerial vehicle market matures, we see segmentation of the vehicles and applications. We have mapped various drone applications with Amprius Technologies cells that enable the performance these applications demand. Our catalog covers UAV missions from minutes to months for both one-way munitions and reusable platforms. Reusable drones are shown at the top of our diagram. Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance are drones.

Drones as first responder and delivery drones tend to need a combination of power for takeoff and landing and energy for flight time. Amprius Technologies meets these requirements with our balanced line of SiCore cells. HAPS, like those described earlier, require maximum energy, which we deliver with our new SiCore 500 cells and other batteries depicted in red. The bottom of our diagram covers low-cost attritable, or one-way, drones. Our balanced cells are often used by deep-strike drones.

Interceptor drones need power to quickly reach maximum speed and intercept a hostile drone, and our high-power cells deliver. Cell content per aircraft ranges from hundreds of dollars to tens of thousands, so mix matters here as much as volume. Please note that Amprius Technologies silicon anode cells deliver premium performance that is not required by all drones. The power needs of low-cost first-person-view, or FPV, drones are often met by off-the-shelf, low-cost graphite anode cells.

We do not chase these opportunities. Please now turn to Slide 5. While the results of the recent U.S. midterm elections could have an impact on the fiscal 2027 U.S. defense budget, we believe that the widespread adoption of military drones by armed forces across the world is here to stay. As we have noted before, the Trump administration’s proposed 2027 budget calls for more than $50 billion in outlays for the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group, an arm of the Department of Defense focused on drones and related hardware.

While the U.S. Congress has yet to pass the 2027 spending authorization, and the actual budget might be smaller than the original request, it is nonetheless clear that the Pentagon will be making a major and growing outlay for autonomous capabilities for years to come, and Amprius Technologies expects to be a beneficiary of that trend. Independent of the size of the 2027 defense budget, we believe the U.S. will meaningfully increase spending on drones.

Emil Michael, the Department of Defense’s Undersecretary for Research and Engineering, said at The Wall Street Journal Tech Conference last week that the U.S. was, quote, caught flat-footed by drone warfare and weren’t prepared because we just didn’t imagine it. I just want to make sure we are imagining the next fight. Many countries recognize the asymmetric advantage drones provide on the modern battlefield. U.S. allies, including Ukraine, Taiwan, and the U.K., have rolled out drone programs with combined spending of more than $20 billion over the next three years.

Other programs are underway in Germany, Poland, the Nordics, Japan, and South Korea. Note that several countries either prefer or require allied-source cells, which favors suppliers like Amprius Technologies. We are keenly aware of these trends and we are positioning Amprius Technologies to win. In Q3, we hired two Europe-based sales account managers. On Monday, November 9th, we hosted a High Energy Battery Day in Tel Aviv attended by about 100 people from dozens of Israeli companies.

On Slide 6, we wanted to highlight our view of market share and growth rates. Amprius Technologies estimates the total defense-related cell demand in 2026 from the U.S. and allied nations is $445 million, up 28% from 2025. With our updated 2026 revenue forecast of $145 million, nearly twice our 2025 total, we believe we are growing approximately three and a half times faster than the market. Our industry-leading technical performance has allowed us to outperform the overall market.

Looking forward, by 2030 we expect loitering munitions and interceptors to be the fastest-growing segments with a projected 58% compound annual growth rate. These applications align well with the core strengths of our cell portfolio. Let me now turn the call over to Ricardo to review our Q3 results in detail.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Thank you, Tom. Good morning, everyone. I’ll start my remarks with slide 7 as the backdrop. Before we dive into the results, I’ll summarize the main things to take away this morning. First, we had a record quarter, revenue of $39.1 million, up 83% year over year, with gross margin holding at about 27% through a tougher mix with more cylindrical sales than originally expected. Second, gross margin has the potential to improve from here. I’ll walk through each driver of margin this quarter and why I see each one as an opportunity rather than a headwind.

Next, behind our third revenue guidance raise, we’ve made deliberate investments to keep outpacing the markets that we serve. We are raising 2026 revenue guidance to $145 million. We are also updating adjusted EBITDA guidance to at least $2.5 million as we invest ahead of projected demand. And fourth, our balance sheet is actively funding the ramp. We have $60.7 million of cash and no debt. The cash we used this quarter went into securing supply for Q4 and early 2027 and we believe it will quickly be turned into more cash as we fulfill near-term demand.

The third quarter was our seventh consecutive quarter of sequential double-digit top-line growth. North America drove the quarter, more than doubling to $12.2 million, while Europe held steady at $23.3 million. Through nine months, revenue is $101.7 million, up 113%. Gross profit was $10.5 million, up 13% sequentially and more than 3x year over year. Gross margin was 26.9%, close to level with Q2’s 27.3% and up from 15% a year ago. For the first nine months of the year, gross margin was 25.1% versus 5% last year.

Excluding Colorado costs in both years, gross margin was 26.3% year to date and 15% for the same period last year. A year ago I said there would be a quarter or two where margins take a step back as we manage mix and as North America grows ahead of us getting paid for NDAA compliance; both factors applied in Q3. But we still held gross margin at 27% by managing a couple of ins and outs. Two headwinds cost us about 8 points of gross margin. Mix took about 4 — more cylindrical cells, much of it shipping against the large European order, and more shipments to North America. Freight took the other half of these eight points, as we shipped by air quickly to meet demand. We nearly made all of it back, though. About four points came from lower expenses in Fremont, and an $800,000 portion of that moved to R&D, since that team focused on development and engineering prototyping the DIU line, and the rest we were able to recover in pricing.

Each of these drivers is a lever that our team is getting better at managing proactively. On the next slide, I will outline in more detail how these factors drive our margin outlook. Q3 operating expenses were $15.2 million, up $1.7 million sequentially. Excluding the $800,000 of Fremont expenses that were reallocated from cost of goods sold, operating expenses grew by about $900,000. That is in line with the $1 million quarterly rate I outlined in August, and it went mostly to development, including SiCore 500. Our net loss was $3.5 million, or negative $0.02 per share, 10% narrower than a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $1 million and negative 3% margin.

Over the last 12 months, adjusted EBITDA was negative $1.4 million on $127 million of revenue and very close to break even. Now let me turn to our outlook on slide 8. In March, we set an initial 2026 revenue outlook of more than $125 million. We raised our forecast to $130 million in May and then to at least $140 million in August. With what we know today, we are raising it a third time to $145 million. That is $20 million above where we started the year. The chart at the top of the slide shows why our annualized run rate went from $114 million in Q1 to $136 million in Q2 and $156 million in Q3.

Our guide implies Q4 revenue of about $43.3 million, up about 11% from Q3. Our goal remains the same as it has been all year: to deliver what we promise and, when we can, some more. Our implied Q4 annual run rate would be $173 million. On gross margin, we continue to expect at least 28% for the full year. We’re at 25% through nine months, so the fourth quarter carries a real step up. We believe that we can get there by managing the following drivers. The first is mix and volume. The orders that we have in hand for Q4 will likely carry a richer mix than Q3, with more pouch cell demand in the current and expected purchase orders. The second is unit cost. We continue spreading fixed cost over more cells, and so this works to our advantage.

The third one is freight. Freight was a painful 11% of revenue in Q3. Moving most cell shipments from air to ocean starting around year end can halve that cost, or provide us about five points at today’s revenue run rate. That is mostly a 2027 benefit, but with more inventory on hand, we are going after this for the first time before the end of this year. The last one is pricing. In this high-demand environment, we’ll continue optimizing for this as the markets that we sell into confirm that we have a uniquely differentiated high-performance product.

Mix will keep moving from quarter to quarter as we adjust to shifting supply and demand trends. But each of these levers is in our hands, and nothing about our path to gross margins above 30% has changed. As I’ve said before, it won’t be a straight line up and to the right, but our visibility is improving over time. Moving to the rest of our outlook, we now expect adjusted EBITDA of at least $2.5 million, and I’ll walk you through that bridge on the next slide. We are reiterating a net loss of $10 million or less. That includes the $1.9 million non-cash warrant charge from Q2. Excluding it, the net loss is expected to be about $8 million. We are updating our EPS outlook to a loss of $0.07 or less per diluted share, and $0.06 excluding the warrant exchange. These all assume a share count of 143.4 million shares.

Finally, we continue to expect capital expenditures below $10 million for the year, funding the DIU-backed investments in Fremont while keeping our capital-efficient, low fixed-cost model. On slide 9, I’ll walk you through our target adjusted EBITDA for the year. As I mentioned earlier, we are updating our 2026 outlook to at least $2.5 million from more than $4 million in August. The bridge is simple. The $5 million revenue raise at a gross margin of at least 28% adds about $1.4 million of gross profit. We have chosen to invest about $2.9 million more in operating expenses this year.

These investments are already paying dividends in various aspects, such as R&D — taking SiCore 500 at 500 Wh/kg on conventional lithium-ion lines from launch to customer qualification — and we also continue certifying our entire cell portfolio to more stringent standards that will keep extending our competitive lead. The second is enabling US production. Good examples of this are starting production on the DIU pilot line in Fremont in December and enabling Caminas in Indianapolis for pouch volume production in the first quarter of 2027.

And finally, driving our recent go-to-market wins, including the design wins that Tom described earlier in his remarks, including the subsea UUV win and the expected Quantum Systems work into orders. One last item to keep in mind for Q4: we expect to complete about $6 million of work under our $18.1 million Defense Innovation Unit agreement before the end of the year. We record that as other income, not revenue. Consistent with how we have always defined adjusted EBITDA, that is included in our outlook.

We ended the third quarter with $60.7 million of cash and no At-The-Market equity offering facility that would increase the share count. Cash was down $13.8 million in the quarter. Our operations used $7.8 million, and capital expenditures were $5.2 million, all at our Fremont facility and supporting the DIU-backed investments. The operating cash use was the working capital built to drive near-term growth, and it was deliberate. Prepaid expenses rose $14 million to $18.9 million and included advances to our partners to secure supply for the Q4 and 2027 ramp.

Receivables grew $5.2 million to $45.9 million with higher shipments, and inventory grew $4.4 million to $15.9 million, also in order to drive near-term growth. Higher payables and accrued liabilities offset a good part of that. This build is also what is now letting us ship by ocean instead of by air, which drives our long-term gross margin floor. Working capital ended at $107.8 million compared to $90.7 million a year ago, and total stockholders’ equity was $124.7 million.

Our contract manufacturing model keeps capacity growth capital-light, and our balance sheet funds the ramp ahead. As we get to the close of the year, I’d like to thank our team for delivering a record quarter, margin drivers that we can pursue and act on, a third revenue forecast raise, and for protecting a balance sheet that funds the ramp with no debt. We expect to head into 2027 with more customers, very clear demand visibility, NDAA-compliant US capacity coming online, and the cost structure built to capture more than our fair share of opportunity. With that, I’m happy to turn the call back to Tom for his closing remarks.

Thank you very much for your attention and continued support.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Ricardo, thank you. Amprius Technologies continues to see wide and varied growth opportunities across multiple markets and geographies. We remain bullish about the opportunity in drones for the defense sector, but that is far from our only market. We expect growing commercial demand for drones in delivery, inspection, agriculture, search and rescue, and other areas in the months and years ahead. We’re equally encouraged by the outlook for our batteries in e-mobility applications, including e-motorcycles and scooters for personal and commercial robots, and for electric vehicle takeoff and landing aircraft for point-to-point regional transport of both passengers and cargo. In short, the future looks bright for Amprius Technologies, and we appreciate your continued support on this journey. Operator, we can open the floor for questions.

OPERATOR

Thank you. If you’d like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you’d like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. To allow for as many questions as possible, we ask that you each keep to one question and one follow-up.

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Colin Rush with Oppenheimer and Company. Please proceed with your question.

Colin Rush (Analyst)

Thanks much, guys. You know, you raised the target for 2030 in the deck from $600 million to $800 million in revenue. And you’ve talked a lot of detail here around the drone opportunity. Can you talk a little bit about what’s happening with both US and allied military procurement and those sales processes that you’re seeing that’s going to support that increase in revenue over the next four or five years?

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Yeah. One of the slides, Colin — thank you, this is Tom — shows the worldwide opportunity and the total $20 billion that you get over three years. And we expect that that will come through and more will be added to it. And as we mentioned, some of that is a function of the actual ’27 defense budget. But what we are seeing is flow-through. The numbers that you see — that we show on our slides — are translating to orders that we are receiving here.

The increase in North America is one indication of that — right — 2.2x quarter over quarter. So it is flowing down to the drone manufacturers and to the battery suppliers like Amprius Technologies that are supplying to the craft. So it is happening.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah. The other thing to add, Colin, is that—and you’re referring to Slide 17—that number has always been anchored by what we believe that we can realistically supply given our existing agreements and capacity plans. And so the 200 megawatt-hour add in 2030 capacity is basically what we expect to have up and running with our South Korean partner by then, and then also the capacity at Caminus. So between both facilities we should be adding, depending on the mix, anywhere between 270 and 300 megawatt-hours per year.

Colin Rush (Analyst)

That’s super helpful, guys. And then on the technology roadmap, you’ve laid out some of those targets and the progress that you can make over the next couple of years with performance. Can you talk a little bit about where you’re at on executing against that roadmap, what that’s doing for your customer relationships, and any update on various materials or chemistries that we should be thinking about that could start impacting some of those performance metrics?

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

We have a robust technology team. They are on the treadmill. Sitecore 500 is the latest example of an industry-leading cell that is now available. What we’re trying to do is get earlier into the design cycle of our customers. So rather than wait and understand publicly what might be available, we’re reaching out and sharing roadmaps—under appropriate NDAs, of course—with customers like the one we mentioned in the call here. With Quantum Systems, we’re close with them, we’re close with others, and that way we can share with them not just what was recently released, but what we’re working on for 2027.

You asked about the supply chain. We have an NDAA-compliant supply chain. There are 18 different components to our batteries—anode, cathode, electrolyte, separator, etc. We have reviewed those individual components for NDAA compliance with the Department of Defense. They are happy with it. We are in execution mode on that. We’re supplying those cells today with some of the partners we mentioned. We have more to do, of course, but we’re happy with the roadmap on the technology side and the timing wise.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, I mean, basically the Sitecore 500 announcement came out three months before we promised it when we first put out that chart on the evolution of the performance of the cell. So we’re on track.

Colin Rush (Analyst)

Perfect, guys. Thank you so much.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Thanks. Thanks, Colin.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of George Gianrigis with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed with your question.

George Gianrigis (Analyst)

Hi, everyone. Good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. Hey, Ricardo, so maybe to focus a little bit on your long-term margin guidance for 2030, as you’re having these conversations with your contract manufacturing partners, how have those sort of either increased your conviction or maybe decreased them in those margin targets over the next five years? Thank you.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, so one thing that gives us even more conviction about the longer-term gross margin target is that as our volumes increase, we have a better idea of what the fixed cost structure of the CMs looks like. And so one of the points that we’ve been making to them here as the volumes have grown is, okay, given that those are fixed, why don’t you just charge them to me as a fixed expense and let’s keep the variable piece of it variable, and that way we can share in some of that operating leverage.

We’re also developing capabilities in-house to manage the CMs. So some of the setup and engineering work that the CM would normally be doing themselves and amortizing within each piece will ideally no longer be there with some of these new relationships that we’re setting up. I mean, we’re getting pretty hands-on at owning the process and driving this within the CMs. And as we do that ourselves, we think we can find scalability that otherwise wouldn’t be there if it’s kind of bucketed within each CM.

George Gianrigis (Analyst)

Thank you. And as your market opportunity grows, there are competitors trying to break in as well. And what would you say the factors are that most frequently tips competitive evaluations in your favor?

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Well, the first one is really just the ability to fulfill the order. Right. You know, we have seen a lot of competitors put out press releases where they’re in essence taking the specs of our previous generation product, thinking that that’ll be enough to get volume, but they really have a chicken-or-the-egg problem, right? Where they don’t have the customer. The technology is, frankly, a generation behind what our team is currently developing. And, you know, we’ve seen several of our customers actually place relatively larger volume orders with these potential competitors, only for them to not be fulfilled because the product only exists in the slide.

We also have the capability here, George, in Fremont, with our pilot line. It’ll be fully up and running at the beginning of the year. There’s 30 new tools, 28 of which are installed. We still need a couple more to come in. That allows us to stay on that innovation edge. And we can make 700 to 1,000 cells a day once we are at steady state. And we do that not for volume orders, but for new orders and different chemistry platforms and customers that want us to turn the knobs and provide new cells, sample cells.

So that ability to do quick-turn designs directly with our customers rapidly helps us. We stay where we want to stay at the.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, I think if you look at, for example, Slide 6 and demand that Tom framed out, we’re talking about roughly a $450 million cell market here in 2026. And, okay, we’re selling our $145 million of revenue roughly into that, assuming that all of our sales are into this cell market, which only 75% of them really are. But when I look at the competitive landscape, the second and third biggest competitors, at most, can do $80 million of revenue per year, and the second one can do $40 million a year of revenue if they execute, and also they’re capacity-limited.

So I do think that we have plenty of room here to grow while the competition is kind of capacity constrained. And that’s why we’re finding out that this contract manufacturing model, if we can stand this capacity up quickly enough, is actually pretty good.

George Gianrigis (Analyst)

Thank you so much.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Thanks, George.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Schutter with William Blair. Please proceed with your question.

Mark Schutter (Analyst)

Hey, Tom and Ricardo, congrats again on the quarter. Thanks for new slides. Of course, touching on the new slides that you had breaking out the allied defense drone spending related to the midterms, as you mentioned, Tom, I think the common through-line is that maybe the blue wave will tamper defense spending. But again, I don’t think we agree that that would impact the current U.S. drone demand. But looking at a slightly different angle, if Democrats want to increase the support for the Ukrainian defense efforts, could the blue wave actually be more of a tailwind and not even net neutral or net negative, but could the blue wave be a tailwind in 27

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Look, it certainly could be. We all want that conflict—and of course, so there are that possibility. And it’s also the slide before the one you mentioned that showed the different types of drones, super interesting to us because if you look at that, all right, maybe some of the one-way drones would decrease if peace does come sooner than—and of course we all want that—but the surveillance and other ones probably increase in a peace-type situation.

So we believe that there are a lot of legs to this drone story. It’s the decade of the drone, the tide’s coming in, all the euphemisms that you want, again because of the asymmetric advantage. So almost independent—and we tried to make this point—of the actual budget, drone spending will be higher, right? Fewer tanks, more drones in defense. And then also we see some of that same asymmetry with delivery. We’ve seen recent announcements from companies with agriculture, etc. So it is a very good spot for us as a battery supplier to drone companies across the different segments and across the different geographies.

Mark Schutter (Analyst)

Thanks, Tom. And on that next slide where you break out the cell demand and the market size, I did notice that pricing was at $350 a kilowatt-hour. You know, our understanding of pricing is almost double that. So I’m just wondering if those numbers that you have for the TAM could be conservative, or are you assuming that there is some pricing?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

They are. This includes a lot of cylindrical cells as well, so I think it’s worth keeping that in mind. The $600-plus and, in some cases, even $1,300 per kilowatt-hour is at the pack level. So there’s some add-on to this here. We wanted to just strip it down to the cells, and we were, you know, pretty conservative on what the mix of this would be and also on what the pricing could be. But that’s a good catch, Mark.

Mark Schutter (Analyst)

Great. Thanks, gentlemen.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Thank you, Mark.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Eric Stein with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please proceed with your question.

Eric Stein (Analyst)

Hi, Tom. Hi, Ricardo. Good morning.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Hey, Eric. Morning. Morning.

Eric Stein (Analyst)

Hey. So I do want to go back to Slide 6. And, you know, you just talked about the limitations of your competitors and obviously you’ve got the competitive advantage and the broad product offering, etc. You know, when you right now, you know, estimated share around 30%, I mean, how do you think about share, you know, as the market continues to expand pretty rapidly? I mean, is this growth with the market because you can actually deliver on this? Are there market share gains?

How do you think about that, I guess, 2028, 2030, and beyond?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, that’s a good question. For 2028, you know, the recent capacity increase announcements definitely help us go and maintain our share, but I would say stay tuned. Right. Obviously we have to assess where the demand is coming from. All signs point to it continuing to come from Europe. And so, you know, we haven’t announced anything around capacity in Europe. I think that the roughly 300 megawatt-hours that we’ll add here in the U.S. over the next year and a half, two years for NDAA compliance helps us satisfy this near-term need that we see.

And if you look at the U.S. portion of the bar as a floor, it can more than use up that demand that we’re setting up. And so, yeah, I think this will evolve. I mean, we’ll look at these market figures quarterly. We’re pretty in tune with the main demand drivers. And I think that’s the beauty of our model, where we’re in essence building up capacity much faster than what it would take to set up our own captive plant. I mean, even the one plant that would produce the number of SKUs that we have and a mix of pouches and cylindricals at these relatively low volumes—and I say relative to other markets like EVs and stationary storage—the plant just does not exist.

I don’t think anybody, as we talk to our experts around the process design and how to get this done, I don’t think anybody can set up one plant that is, you know, sub a couple gigawatt-hours and produce so many different types of cells with these margins. It does need to be done through multiple leveraged facilities at contract manufacturers. And the speed is also critical, too. I think the speed is what’s enabled us to get more than our fair share of this market here.

And if we keep going, it’s what will enable us to keep outpacing the growth of the market as we laid it out here on Slide 6.

Eric Stein (Analyst)

Got it. Thank you for that. And maybe just for my follow-up, at the end of the prepared remarks, you know, obviously bullish on drones, but then talked about commercial and talked about robotics and light EVs, etc., other applications. I mean, maybe I would assume 2027 is still vast majority is going to be about drones, UAVs, but maybe as you think about the mix evolving as you get out to 2030 and beyond, how do you think about that in terms of your overall business?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, 2027 will still be drone-dominant in terms of our revenue percentage. As we get to 2030, to your question, we think it’s going to be more balanced in a couple ways. Number one is some of the other segments that we talk in the deck, including eVTOLs, including robotics. That is where we are spending some time today. We’ve added to our sales force, as we mentioned, with European folks and others. And we’ve also stood up a separate business development arm so that we are attracting some of those further-out opportunities.

So that’s something that we think about. I think the balance also from a supply side will be better balanced in three, four years. Customers are starting to ask for batteries from specific locations, and we are responding. That’s part of why you see Caminus. That’s part of why you see what we’re doing with our South Korean partners in the U.S. So that will come into the actual supply of that demand in that timeframe and will be better balanced between China, generally Asia, mostly South Korea, and the U.S. at the end of the decade.

Okay, thank you. Thanks, Eric.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Thanks, Eric.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Austin Bowling with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your question.

Austin Bowling (Analyst at Needham & Company)

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question, and congrats on the solid results here. Maybe just wanted to first start on kind of the new updated guidance. Third time you raised it. Would just love to maybe talk through kind of different scenarios and, like, maybe potential further upside to kind of this new target.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

And sorry, just to be clear, you’re referring to the year or the longer-term one, Austin?

Austin Bowling (Analyst at Needham & Company)

The year. The 145.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, so the 145. You know, we made it just the 145 simply because we run out of time here with the end of the year coming. And I do think that, you know, when it’s time to put out the 2027 number, we’ve got pretty good visibility in that. But obviously, the longer we can spend building that book, the more solid that will be as we communicate it. I do think that what is implied by the guide, which is around 43.3 million of revenue for Q4, makes a lot of sense from where we stand, especially if we’re trying to get to really strong gross margins. The guide, in essence, implies margins getting to almost 35%. And in order to do that, we really do need to be heavy on the pouch side. And so that’s the main goal. I do think that if we weren’t so focused on managing the margins in Q4, to your point, there could be additional upside on the top line.

But I do think that in this phase that we’re in, demonstrating our path to profitability and the margin potential of the business, given that we have a pretty healthy backlog, is more important than just continuing to build up the revenue base.

Austin Bowling (Analyst at Needham & Company)

Okay, very helpful. And I think, too, like really seems exciting opportunity in the subsea market. Just curious on how, like, the content per vehicle in that may differ to drones.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Yeah, good question. So we are also very excited about that. There’s a lot of opportunity underneath the surface. Generally, these craft are larger compared to drones, so the battery content tends to scale with the overall size of the craft. Some of that depends a bit on the mission that the craft is actually doing. There are some one-way underwater drones. There are some surveillance drones also, just like we show in one of our diagrams. So it’s a new space for us. We are talking to many customers, and some of the same value that we provide, in particular the ability to handle, you know, 9,000 feet, 3,000 meters, is somewhat unique to our design. So we want to exploit that and then try to get some more wins on the board.

Austin Bowling (Analyst at Needham & Company)

All right, perfect. Well, thank you, Tom, and keep up the good work, guys.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Awesome. Thank you. Thank you.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Finks with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Ryan Finks (Analyst)

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Morning, Ryan, how are you?

Ryan Finks (Analyst)

Hey, Ricardo. Maybe just a follow-up on the revenue mix and thinking about 2027. You know, understanding you’re not giving guidance yet, but how should we be thinking about the potential breakdown next year between U.S. versus international opportunities as we try to size the potential for U.S. growth going into ’27?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah. The way we’re thinking about it right now is that if the U.S. can double year over year, that would be a decent—that would be kind of its contribution to the mix for next year. A lot of it is supply-dependent as well, right? So the onus is on us to get the capacity at Caminus in particular and in South Korea to be higher than what it is today. But yeah, I think if we can do a doubling of our U.S. business going into next year, that would be sort of my best estimate for what the mix of it would be.

Ryan Finks (Analyst)

That’s helpful. And then I wanted to touch on the progress of your South Korean contract manufacturing partners and the progress they’ve made growing their capacity, and maybe you could frame what that capacity looks like today or where you expect it to be by the end of next year.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah. So at the August call we gave the names of three of our contract manufacturing partners in South Korea. There’s a fourth that we’ve added and officially signed up, and there’s more that we’re working with. Our team was over in South Korea two weeks ago. I’ll be there in about 10 days myself, probably once again before the end of the calendar year. So it is a market we’re spending an awful lot of time on to help stand them up. They are working well.

What we’re doing—and I think many folks understand this—is, in order to protect our intellectual property, which is mostly centered around the anode, there is one CM in South Korea that is making our anodes for us, and we’re providing coils to companies like Caminus that are putting together the batteries. So we have tried to be thoughtful about how we industrialize the various CMs in South Korea, particularly not just to get the scale and the cost that we want, but at the same time make sure that we are protecting our IP and also making it faster for newer CMs like Caminus to come up to speed.

If we take a little bit off of their shoulders and they’re focused just on assembly and test, for example—the back two-thirds, the middle and the last part of a typical lithium-ion cell factory—focusing the first third at one trusted partner, that helps speed, it helps cost, it helps IP protection.

Ryan Finks (Analyst)

That’s helpful detail. Congrats on the progress, guys.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Ryan, thank you.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Derek Soderbergh with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please proceed with your question.

Derek Soderbergh (Analyst)

Yeah. Hey, Tom. Hey, Ricardo. So my first question is related to the earlier question on pricing. The $350 per kilowatt hour side—core pricing is higher than that—but curious how that has sort of trended, that figure, as volumes have ramped up in Korea. And, you know, I think, Ricardo, you had said that the $350 figure was conservative, but should we view that as more or less kind of a longer-term blended average price as you sort of get into the gigawatt scale?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, I think that’s a—you know, the 350 is a very long-term floor that is very cylindrical-heavy, right? So if you look at what’s on slide 6, I think it’s probably fair to assume that, you know, 70% of that is cylindrical, which we obviously are trying to disprove as we create the market. And to your question on recent pricing, recent pricing has actually trended higher relative to what our expectations were going back just a little over a year ago, especially on some of the pouches.

The cylindrical pricing is challenging. It’s also more challenging to demonstrate better performance on a cylindrical cell, so that makes total sense. And that’s why we’re pretty incentivized to drive our pouch cell portfolio in every way we can.

Derek Soderbergh (Analyst)

Ricardo, can you touch on that a bit more? Just can you pull out the mix portion of the pricing increase you’re talking about? What else has been contributing to that—negotiations, better technology? Is there anything else that’s sort of driving pricing beyond mix right now?

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, I think the main thing driving pricing right now is that there’s no capacity out there in the market. Either you are stuck buying a standard lithium-ion cell, or you try to get a high-performance cell from a very short list of participants like us. On the cylindrical side, there is more competition, right? You know, Molicel has a high-performance cell in the cylindrical market that, you know, we think they’re not pricing as high as they should, frankly.

And there are several other players selling standard cylindrical cells at pretty low prices that sometimes make us even question, okay, you know, if we cannot source a cylindrical cell at a certain point cost, why do we bother with this, especially when we have so much demand on the pouch side? So that’s something that we’ll continue managing here as we build out the portfolio. And our team is not standing still, right? We’re figuring out a way to get even more performance out of a cylindrical cell, potentially.

Derek Soderbergh (Analyst)

Got it. Super helpful. That’s all for me. Thanks, guys.

Ricardo C Rodriguez (Chief Financial Officer)

Thanks. Thanks, Derek.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chip Moore with Roth Capital Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Chip Moore (Analyst)

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe one on retrofit of the EV battery line. Just talk about progress on key milestones there and how those tie into future grant disbursements.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Yeah, Chip, thanks for your question. I’ll take that. So the competitive contract—to use the appropriate language that we’ve been coached from the Department of Defense, because it’s exactly that; it’s competitive—and the contract has started. This time last week, actually Wednesday last week, we had our kickoff meeting with the team in D.C., attended, of course, with our friends and partners in South Korea. There are 15 milestones. It’s a 24-month program.

The first part is about making sure we provide the correct tools that will go into the factory, and then there’s some retrofitting of the factory itself that comprises most spending. We spend first, and then we are reimbursed for that spending. Some of that flows through Amprius Technologies, right? So we will work with our South Korean partners to spec up tools. They will buy the tools, we will invoice the government, they will send us funds, and we will send most of those funds for tools, in this example, to South Korea. So that’s how it’s working. It’s up and running. There’s a lot of work to do. It’ll start to look real once we start to deliver equipment to the factory and the retrofit.

So that’s probably summer, fall of 2027, but we’re up and running. We’re off to the races.

Chip Moore (Analyst)

Excellent. Thanks, Tom. And maybe for my follow-up, the slides around defense spending—slide 5—with particularly a lot of European allied nations in there, and you also talked about some hiring over there. Do you see a need for additional contract manufacturing over in Europe here sooner than later, or how are you thinking about that? Thanks.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

We do some of the requests. I mentioned earlier that customers have specific requests. There’s a law, of course, here in the U.S., the National Defense Authorization Act, that is very clear on what is required and when. The when is about 14 months from now, depending on the program, but generally the beginning of 2028. There is not a law in Europe generally, but there are some preferences that we are starting to hear from our customers. We have discussions underway.

We ran first on a specific mission to look at some European CMs. Oh gosh, a year or so ago. Actually, one of our engineers is in Europe visiting his folks, but he is stopping by and spending tomorrow with one of the CMs that we’ve seen in the past. As you can imagine, there’s a lot of work that happens before we actually announce customers. Right. We started working with Caminus, oh my gosh, probably in the spring. We announced it a month or so ago. So that will come. That will be. Give us some of that same balance that I, that I tried to answer on one of the other questions. Thank you. Thank you, Chip.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Amit Dayal with HC Wainwright. Proceed with your question.

Amit Dayal (Analyst)

Thank you. Good morning, guys. Just one question from me. Hey, guys. So, you know, China recently implemented some tax policy changes that have been disruptive to the mining industry over there a little bit, at least in the near term. You know, a lot of margin pressure, a lot of sort of orders being pushed out, etc. Does this development potentially help Amprius?

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Potentially. Right. As different countries are implementing either protective measures or other types of restrictions, we have to be nimble. And that’s part of why we have more than one leg to stand on: South Korea, U.S., cylindrical, pouch. So we keep our finger on the pulse of what’s happening around that front. We have a team, we have a 12-person team in China that is present. And so we’re on top of it. We have outside government affairs firm, various lawyers who also keep us up to date on some of these geopolitical considerations, and that’s part of how we run the show internally here.

So, Amit, the other thing to keep in mind is that a lot of this shakeout happens in way larger markets than what we’re addressing—so mainly EVs and stationary storage. And so, you know, in some ways I do think that we’re sort of flying our plane either above or below that turbulence.

Amit Dayal (Analyst)

Understood. Thank you, guys. That’s all I have.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Thanks. Thank you.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Sullivan with Jones Trading. Please proceed with your question.

Josh Sullivan (Analyst)

Good morning. Just wanted to kind of get your thoughts on how Part 108 evolves. And, you know, whenever that happens, you know, how quickly is that going to translate to, you know, activity for you guys? You know, how do you think the market kind of evolves? Just wanted to kind of get your thoughts around that as we get closer.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Hey, Josh. Well, that’s the line of sight regulation, right?

Josh Sullivan (Analyst)

Yeah. On the commercial side. BVLOS.

Thomas M Stepien (President and CEO)

Yeah, yeah. I mean, I think that that’ll unlock a good bit of non-defense demand, and there’s a big ecosystem