Alta Equipment Group Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Alta Equipment Group (NYSE:ALTG) reported third-quarter financial results on Tuesday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.

This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation.

Access the full call at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/500034146

Summary

Alta Equipment Group reported third quarter 2026 consolidated revenue of $417.4 million with an adjusted EBITDA of $44.9 million, which represents a 7.7% increase from the previous year, despite a 1.2% decline in revenue.

The company highlighted improvements in operating efficiency and capital productivity, with inventory and net rental fleet declining by approximately $45 million since year-end, leading to a cash flow improvement of about $73 million year-to-date.

Despite a slight decrease in construction equipment deliveries, both construction and material handling segments showed positive growth, with material handling bookings increasing significantly, indicating a cyclical recovery.

Alta Equipment Group revised its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $165-$170 million, citing timing shifts in equipment deliveries as the main reason, while maintaining a strong backlog and demand outlook for 2027.

Management highlighted ongoing strategic initiatives to improve rental business efficiency, optimize fleet utilization, and enhance service and parts profitability, leading to better cash generation and returns.

Future outlook remains positive with expectations of stronger earnings and cash flow in 2027, driven by a leaner operational structure, robust demand in material handling, and sustained growth in construction equipment markets.

Full Transcript

Leah (Operator)

Earnings Conference Call. My name is Leah, and I will be your moderator for today’s call. I will now turn the call over to Jason Dammeyer, Vice President of Accounting and Reporting. Please proceed.

Jason Dammeyer (Vice President of Accounting and Reporting)

Thank you, Leah. Good morning everyone, and thank you for joining us today. A press release detailing Alta Equipment Group’s third quarter 2026 financial results was issued yesterday and is posted on our website, along with the presentation designed to assist you in understanding the company’s results. On the call with me today are Ryan Greenawalt, our Chairman and CEO, and Tony Koluchi, our Chief Financial Officer. For today’s call, management will first provide a review of our third quarter 2026 financial results.

We will begin with some prepared remarks before we open the call for your questions. Please proceed to slide 2. Before we get started, I’d like to remind everyone that this conference call may contain certain forward-looking statements, including statements about future financial results, our business strategy and financial outlook, achievements of the company, and other non-historical statements. As described in our press release, these forward-looking statements are subject to both known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including those related to Alta Equipment Group’s growth, market opportunities, and general economic and business conditions.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, we undertake no obligation to revise any statement to reflect changes that occur after this call. Descriptions of these and other risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are discussed in our reports filed with the SEC, including our press release that was issued yesterday.

During this call we may present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in yesterday’s press release and can be found on our website at investors.altaequipment.com. I will now turn the call over to Ryan.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Thank you, Jason, and good morning everyone. I appreciate you joining us to review Alta Equipment Group’s third quarter 2026 results. My comments will focus on the broader market environment, equipment demand trends, and progress on our operating initiatives. Tony will then cover the financial results, capital structure, and updated guidance. The central takeaway from the quarter is that we’re seeing improvement in both the operating performance and financial profile of our business.

Despite slightly lower revenue, we generated higher adjusted EBITDA and improved margins in several key areas. We’re also making progress on capital efficiency and strengthening our balance sheet. Combined with improving equipment demand, we believe these initiatives position Alta for stronger earnings and cash flow in 2027. Starting with the broader market environment, we continue to see a constructive backdrop across both of our primary end markets. Industrial investment remains supported by domestic manufacturing, reshoring, energy infrastructure, and logistics and distribution facilities. Federal infrastructure funding and elevated state transportation budgets continue to support a substantial pipeline of construction projects. We’re also seeing growing activity associated with data centers and related power infrastructure.

While economic uncertainty continues to influence customer capital spending decisions, the underlying drivers of equipment demand remain favorable. Importantly, we’re seeing these trends reflected in the recent results and outlook of our major OEM partners. Turning first to construction equipment, market deliveries in our territories are up approximately 5% year to date. Despite moderating growth in the third quarter, demand remains supported by infrastructure, municipal spending, energy, and industrial investment. These trends are consistent with Volvo Construction Equipment’s recent commentary. Volvo reported strong North American order growth during the third quarter and continues to anticipate market growth in 2027.

We’re also seeing a healthier competitive environment than a year ago, with dealer inventories moderating, more rational pricing, and stabilized used equipment values. Together, these conditions are supporting improved equipment margins and profitability, and we believe construction equipment is well positioned as we enter next year. Turning to material handling, we’re seeing increasingly clear signs of a cyclical recovery. Industry bookings in our territories increased approximately 67% in the third quarter, bringing year-to-date growth to 27%. These trends are consistent with Hyster-Yale’s recent commentary that customers are beginning to replace aging fleets after an extended period of deferred capital spending. We’re also benefiting from a broader product portfolio that allows us to compete across more applications and price points, particularly in warehousing and distribution.

Our PeakLogix capabilities provide another avenue to participate in larger, more complex customer projects. While customer delivery schedules and equipment availability have delayed the conversion of some orders into revenue, underlying demand remains encouraging. We’re entering 2027 with a stronger backlog and greater visibility into future equipment deliveries, positioning material handling to be an important contributor to our earnings recovery.

Beyond the improving demand environment, we’re making meaningful progress on initiatives designed to improve Alta Equipment Group’s operating efficiency, capital productivity, and cash generation. One of the clearest examples is our rental business. Over the past several quarters, we’ve focused on matching fleet investment more closely to customer demand and eliminating underutilized assets. Despite the smaller fleet, rental revenue increased sequentially during the third quarter, while gross margins improved in both construction equipment and material handling.

This is exactly the type of improvement we’re working toward. We’re reducing capital tied up in the business while improving the productivity of the assets we retain. Our continued focus on utilization, fleet mix, and capital discipline creates an opportunity for stronger cash generation and returns as demand improves. We’re also making progress improving the underlying profitability of our operating platform. Since becoming public, we’ve grown from 43 to 85 locations, building a substantial business with strong OEM relationships and extensive product support capabilities. Our priority now is generating greater productivity from that investment. We’re focused on technician productivity, service pricing and realization, parts and service absorption, and more consistent execution across our branches.

We’re also reducing operating expenses and improving how we deploy inventory, equipment, and personnel throughout the organization. We’re seeing tangible early results from these initiatives even before experiencing the full benefit of recovering equipment sales volumes. Looking ahead, we believe 2027 presents an opportunity for these internal improvements to coincide with a more favorable demand environment. Material handling is entering next year with significantly stronger bookings and backlog. Construction equipment continues to benefit from durable investment trends, and our rental business is generating better productivity from a smaller fleet. The opportunity is to grow revenue across a more efficient operating structure with less incremental capital required to support that growth.

Combined with our recurring product support business, this should improve the quality and durability of earnings through the cycle. Our longer-term strategy remains focused on growing market share, expanding product support, scaling complementary businesses like PeakLogix and Ecoverse, and strengthening our balance sheet. In closing, we’ve spent the last several years building Alta Equipment Group’s platform. We’re now focused on generating more earnings and cash flow from the capital we’ve already invested. The opportunity ahead isn’t simply to recover the earnings we’ve lost during the downturn; it’s to emerge as a stronger business capable of generating better returns and more durable cash flow through the cycle. That’s why we’re increasingly constructive about Alta Equipment Group’s prospects in 2027.

I want to thank our approximately 2,600 employees for their continued commitment to our customers and to improving the business. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Tony. Thanks.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Thanks, Ryan. Good morning everyone, and thank you for your interest in Alta Equipment Group and our third quarter 2026 financial results. Our third quarter results reflect continued progress against the operating and capital priorities we established entering 2026. Before getting into the quarter, I want to thank my Alta teammates, as these results reflect the continued focus and execution of our employees whose commitment to serving our customers and strengthening our business has positioned Alta to capitalize on the opportunities ahead.

My remarks today will focus on three areas. First, I will review our third quarter financial performance and discuss the key drivers behind our results. Second, I’ll discuss capital efficiency, cash flow, and balance sheet, which remain important priorities as we continue to optimize and drive overall returns on capital. Lastly, I’ll Provide our perspective on outlook for the balance of the year and how we see the business positioned as we enter 2027. As always, I’ll be referencing slides throughout our earnings presentation. Throughout today’s call, I’d encourage investors to review our earnings presentation as well as our 10-Q, both of which are available on our investor relations website at altg.com. With that, let me begin with our financial performance.

Starting with the quarter, consolidated revenue was $417.4 million and adjusted EBITDA was $44.9 million, an increase of 7.7% from last year. Despite revenue declining 1.2%, adjusted EBITDA margin expanded approximately 90 basis points to 10.8% while operating expenses declined approximately $3 million. The important takeaway here is that these results were achieved on a meaningfully smaller capital base. Inventory and net rental fleet have declined by approximately $45 million since year end, and year to date, cash flow after investing activities improved approximately $73 million versus last year.

We have also delevered the balance sheet by $17 million since year end. We are demonstrating that Alta can generate more earnings and cash from less invested capital. That remains the central focus of our optimization initiatives. From an operating perspective, consolidated equipment and service margins improved during the quarter. New and used equipment gross margins increased 60 basis points to 15.6%, service gross margins increased 250 basis points to 61.5%, and rental revenue gross margins increased 200 basis points on higher utilization. These improvements reflect better pricing discipline, service productivity, and a more efficient rental fleet. I will keep the segment review focused on two areas that are most important to the current outlook: the commercial inflection in material handling and the combination of growth and improved capital efficiency in construction.

Turning to material handling, the third quarter was $151.6 million of revenue and adjusted EBITDA was $15.4 million. The principal constraint on the quarter was lower new equipment deliveries rather than a deterioration in demand, as commercial indicators have moved meaningfully in a positive direction. As Ryan mentioned, the issue for 2026 has increasingly become throughput and timing. Improved order activity has not yet fully converted into equipment deliveries and revenue.

Based on current delivery schedules and throughput, we now expect some deliveries that we previously anticipated in the second half of this year to move into the first quarter of 2027. Beyond equipment activity, the segment continued to make progress on profitability and efficiency. Material handling gross margin increased 160 basis points to 35%, service gross margin improved by 230 basis points, rental gross margin increased 310 basis points, and operating expenses declined $1.6 million.

These improvements should position the segment to benefit as backlog conversion accelerates. On the construction equipment, this segment provides a good example of what we are trying to accomplish with our optimization efforts. Third quarter revenue increased 5% and adjusted EBITDA increased 11.2% year over year, reflective of cash operating leverage in the business. The larger point is that we have been able to grow the business while taking capital out of it. Construction average assets declined $76.5 million, or 8.4%, while trailing twelve-month adjusted EBITDA remained essentially unchanged at approximately $100 million.

As a result, trailing twelve-month returns on average assets have improved approximately 100 basis points to 11.9%. How is this happening? By maintaining rental revenue on a smaller and more highly utilized fleet, improving service and rental margins, and reducing interest expense through lower average inventory and rental fleet balances. As we look toward 2027, the construction demand environment is positive. Infrastructure activity continues to be supportive in all of our markets as state DOT budgets remain elevated in our largest geographies, which we believe provides a solid commercial backdrop for construction as we enter next year.

Turning briefly to cash flow and the balance sheet, where optimization actions are producing tangible results. Through the first nine months, net cash provided by operating activities was $58.8 million compared with cash used of approximately $1 million in the prior-year period. Cash flows after investing activities totaled $53 million, a significant $73 million improvement year over year. Inventory declined to $448 million from $473 million at year end, while gross book value of the rental fleet was also $58 million below prior year.

At September 30th, total liquidity was approximately $250 million. Net debt declined approximately $20 million in the quarter, and interest expense was $2.5 million lower than the prior-year quarter. Our near-term capital allocation priority remains debt reduction and balance sheet strength. We will continue to focus on working capital discipline, fleet utilization, targeted asset dispositions, expense productivity, and disciplined investment in the core business.

Turning to our 2026 outlook, we have revised our full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $165 million to $170 million and our free cash flow before rent-to-sell decisioning guidance to $95 million to $105 million. The primary driver of the adjusted EBITDA revision is the timing of material handling new equipment deliveries. Based on current throughput and delivery schedules, we expect a portion of the backlog previously contemplated to convert in early 2027 rather than in 2026.

Importantly, material handling bookings and backlog remain supportive. We therefore view the change primarily as a timing shift rather than a change in underlying customer demand. Our construction assumptions remain largely intact, and we continue to see stable demand across our core markets, particularly those benefiting from infrastructure-related municipal and data center activity. We also expect product support and rental performance to benefit from technician productivity, pricing initiatives, improved utilization, and fleet management.

Let me finish with a few comments about how we see the business positioned entering 2027. These comments should not be interpreted as formal 2027 guidance, but overall we are increasingly encouraged by the setup across both of our major segments. First, in material handling, we enter the coming year with substantially better commercial momentum than we entered 2026, as we believe the increase in bookings reflects customers beginning to address pent-up replacement needs following an extended period of fleet replacement deferrals.

Broader lift truck market industry bookings have also improved, reinforcing our view that the material handling market is moving toward more normalized activity. We also believe that organic sales initiatives launched in 2026 in major markets like Toronto and Chicago could yield share gains in 2027. Second, we remain bullish on construction equipment. Our key markets continue to benefit from elevated infrastructure spending and state DOT budgets, while construction equipment deliveries in our territories have improved year to date. Importantly, we are participating in that demand with a significantly leaner rental fleet and asset base than a year ago.

Third, the business entering 2027 is structurally leaner than it was entering 2026. We have taken approximately $45 million out of inventory and net rental fleet since year end, reduced operating expenses, lowered borrowings and interest expense, and continue to improve service productivity and fleet utilization. So, in total, we believe the combination of the improved material handling commercial backdrop, a durable construction demand environment, and benefits of the optimization actions already taken across the business positions Alta to enter 2027 from a significantly stronger operating and capital position when compared to last year.

In closing, the third quarter provided another proof point that our strategy is working. We generated higher adjusted EBITDA and operating income on lower revenue and a smaller capital base while producing materially stronger cash flow. At the same time, material handling bookings and backlog have improved significantly. Construction equipment continues to perform well in supported end markets, and optimization actions taken are creating a more efficient platform.

Combined, we believe these factors position Alta to enter 2027 from a position of strength. Thank you for your time and continued interest in Alta Equipment Group. I’ll now turn the call back over to the operator, and we’re happy to take questions.

Leah (Operator)

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Mike Schliske with DA Davidson. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Mike Schliske (Analyst at DA Davidson)

Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions here. It’s been a few quarters of improvement. Yes, good morning. So it’s been a few quarters of improvement in orders, and it sounds like the 2027 outlook for your end markets seems broadly positive. And I know you’ve changed your rental fleet makeup, just for some of the less returning items and less profitable items, as you’ve made some of the changes there. But do you have any thoughts about, in such a robust environment in ’27, expanding your core rental fleet size and taking on some more assets?

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Mike, this is Tony. Good morning. There are certain areas of the business, specifically I would say in material handling, where we’d be changing the mix of the rental fleet and then maybe just modestly growing where we want to drive share. I mentioned Toronto and Chicago specifically. Those are warehousing and logistics hubs where we want to focus and invest in, and so that would be the first thing that would come to mind. I don’t think this means anything, I would say, material in terms of investment, but we do want to invest in those markets in material handling.

And then in the construction space, I would point to Florida specifically as an area that we continue to see a lot of activity in, more recently around infrastructure associated with data centers. And so that could be an area, but we’d be working around the edges in terms of net growth of the rental fleet. We still want to be mindful of the size of the rental fleet and, again, be more capital efficient than we have previously. But anyway, those are two areas where we may decide to take on a little bit more fleet, but it would be modest.

Mike Schliske (Analyst at DA Davidson)

Okay. Okay, thanks for that. And I want to turn to some of the comments you made on material handling and some of the fourth-quarter business that may be going into the first part of 2027. I guess the concern I have, or question I have here, is what’s behind some of that. Is it just the OEMs having some logistical issues or other kinds of, you know, minor problems getting things to you, or is it high freight costs, etc.? I guess I’m concerned about, you know, there could be some shortages in 2027 in general in that business if the industry is as robust as you say, and rolling in fourth quarter ’26, and they’re already behind schedule.

So I want to get some comfort around, you know, there’s not a lot more of this around the corner once we flip the calendar on January 1st.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Mike, I wouldn’t classify it as everybody’s behind schedule. I think, you know, when you look at some of the inflection here, it’s been pretty robust. And so it’s just a matter of working through the backlog. Customers sometimes have a say on delivery schedules. And keep in mind, these are large fleets that customers want to take. You know, they don’t want to take 50% of the order at a time. They want it to be completed and take it all at one time.

So I wouldn’t characterize this as somebody, you know, dropping the ball or being behind schedule or having any sort of issues. This is simply, you know, working through the production schedule at Hyster-Yale, getting deliveries, being able to do our prep and delivery on the ground, and working things, you know, through the process here. And so I think it’s more reflection of the abrupt inflection in bookings and orders that’s driving a bit of the, you know, the delay relative to what we expected. We’ve always said, you know, either way, it’s an order for Alta Equipment Group. It’s a sale to a customer for Alta Equipment Group, whether it’s in 26 or 27. And if we’re taking share, good for us, because that means more parts and service down the road. And so that’s what’s happening.

We haven’t seen any kind of cancellations of any sort of notable significance. And so this is simply working the process.

Mike Schliske (Analyst at DA Davidson)

Okay, great. I appreciate that color. I’ll pass it along. Thank you.

Leah (Operator)

Your next question comes from the line of Liam Burke with B. Riley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Liam Burke (Analyst at B. Riley)

Thank you. Good morning, Ryan. Good morning, Tony.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Good morning, Liam.

Liam Burke (Analyst at B. Riley)

Ryan, can we go a little more detail about the rental fleet? On construction, you have a smaller rental fleet and you’re still able to generate growth, organic growth, and the margins were up significantly. Is this a trend? I’m understanding quarter to quarter there is variability on both growth and margins. But is this a sustainable trend that you can have with the rental fleet on the construction side?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Liam, that is our intent, for this to be a sustainable pivot in how we approach rental with a little bit more discipline, you know, focus on metrics around utilization and investing money where the growth is. You know, so to Tony’s previous point, you know, we may add fleet where we see demand supporting it, but we’re not going to speculate on fleet to try to grow share or get units out in the field. We’re going to, you know, basically underwrite the rental business based on underlying demand in the regions.

Liam Burke (Analyst at B. Riley)

Great. And on materials handling, you talked about market share.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Liam, I would just add, you know, our intention is to not only hold kind of these utilization metrics that you see from us, but actually continue to drive them even higher. And so we still think that there’s room to go here on, you know, driving even further. And if you look at our history, we actually have been higher on some of the rental metrics. But we definitely have seen an inflection where, you know, the KPIs are all trending upwards here, and we expect that to continue.

Liam Burke (Analyst at B. Riley)

Great, thank you, Tony. And then on materials handling, you talked about market share gains. Is this in the traditional product line, or I know Hyster-Yale has come out with a value brand that you’re also introducing.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Liam, we’d be speaking broadly about market share gains, but I can’t point to the value brand as, like, a big part of those gains. But we’re speaking broadly.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

I think, you know, Liam, just to sub-bullet to that is we—I mentioned Toronto and Chicago. That’s going to be, again, warehouse and logistics sort of vertical markets where a lot of the electric forklifts and warehouse products that Hyster-Yale has developed here, reinvented more recently, you know, we do intend to take share in those product categories as we go forward.

Liam Burke (Analyst at B. Riley)

Thank you, Ryan. Thank you, Tony.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Thanks, Liam.

Leah (Operator)

Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Ramsey with Thompson Research Group. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Stephen Ramsey (Analyst at Thompson Research Group)

Good morning. Team, wanted to start with an overall assessment of the dealer channel. The inventory levels, given the demand backdrop heading into the busy season and as we kind of look into 27. Do you feel like the dealer channel overall, not just you, but in your geographies, is in a healthy place?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Yeah. Good morning, Stephen. You know, I think we’re just about there in terms of equilibrium. I would say, you know, if we’ve got anything left, we’re 90% of the way there. We might be 10% as an industry elevated relative to where we were at when there was a glut of inventory, call it 18, 24 months ago. So I think things have stabilized here. Where we are seeing sort of competitive investment is in some of the rental categories, where, you know, we’re being mindful of where we invest and where we compete. But for the most part, I would say, you know, inventory levels in the construction space have normalized, and we feel pretty good about our inventory levels. As I mentioned, we feel like we still got a little bit of room to go in terms of optimization, but we’ve made a lot of progress, and we feel a lot better about where we’re at today certainly than we did last year at this time.

Stephen Ramsey (Analyst at Thompson Research Group)

That’s great to hear, and wanted to make sure I’m understanding the material handling, bookings and backlog both being very strong. Do you feel that there is any pull-forward that is happening that would dampen activity later in 2027, or do you feel this replacement cycle has some sustained strength possibility beyond the near term?

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Yes, Stephen, good question. I would point investors to a slide in our deck here—it’s slide, bear with me, slide eight of our deck. And if you look at the bottom half of the slide, it shows regional lift truck volumes, and normalized replacement cycle for our territories is something like 42, 43,000 trucks, and we still haven’t got to that level. And so, you know, despite 67% year-over-year bookings, we’re still kind of behind pace relative to replacement.

So we would have a long way—we still have a long way to go before your comment there, in my mind, would be true that there’s pull-forward that would jeopardize 2027, you know, if you just look at what replacement demand has been historically.

Stephen Ramsey (Analyst at Thompson Research Group)

That makes sense. Thanks for the color, Tony.

Leah (Operator)

Your next question comes from the line of Ted Jackson with Northland Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Thank you very much. And guys, I also want to thank you for the change in the cadence of how you do your call. I love the fact that you put your results out last night, had the call this morning.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Not sure we should get used to that, Ted, but we appreciate it.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Oh, come on. I want to get used to it. It’s so much better.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

We’re doing a formal survey on that before we make this permanent.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Okay, well, you’ve already got my vote. On material handling, I want to dig into that one a little bit. You know, I mean, so Hyster-Yale, you know, they had, you know, on the revenue line in the third quarter, things were a little light for them. And a big part of it, aside from some customer delays, was just, you know, some product that was built that just couldn’t ship because it was stuck on boats. And they have a pretty substantial ramp expected in the fourth quarter in the Americas.

And I guess my first question is, with regards to what you saw there in the third quarter, is it fair to expect to see a pretty substantial tick-up on your material handling equipment revenue in the fourth quarter just simply because of delayed product coming in, or is it really more of a 27 phenomenon?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Ted, it’s really hard for us to be able to say whether something is going to—you know, which side of the line of the New Year something’s going to deliver on. I would just remind everybody, and yourself, that when Hyster-Yale delivers, they’re typically delivering to the dealer, and then there’s prep and delivery time where there’s, you know, the physical aspect of finalizing specs for customers at our dealerships. Typically that takes 30 to 45 days.

It can accelerate from there. But their deliveries in Q4, to the extent they’re later in Q4, are likely to be deliveries and revenue for us in Q1. So it’s really hard for us to kind of put a number to it. What we can say is, broadly, we expect better Q4 in 2026 here than we did in 25. And then as we move into 27, you know, hopefully a more robust Q1 here versus what we saw in 26. And so we think we’ve reached an inflection point where we start to lap comps here. It’s just a matter of by how much.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Okay, that’s why I asked. Sticking with material handling equipment sales, thinking about 2027, and again referencing back to Hyster-Yale, I mean, they have been growing backlog and bookings now for over a year, and the expectations out of that company for 2027 for growth in Americas revenue is substantial. And if you look back at kind of prior cycles that they’ve had, I mean, you’ve seen, you know, growth numbers in excess of 20%. And, you know, honestly, you guys have seen that yourself.

I’m not saying that that’s something I would pencil in my model, but is that—you know, if this thing plays out the way that it looks like it might, would we see that kind of potential for that kind of revenue growth for Alta in 27 and then carrying into 28, perhaps?

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Ted, we’ll leave 28 alone for now, but I think that is a realistic probability in 27, given history and what we know about the industry and how it can ebb and flow. A 20% move to the top side coming off of what will probably be the bottom, you know, here in 26, depending on how the fourth quarter shakes out, is doable. It’s not out of the realm of possibility.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Okay. Shifting over to construction, the third quarter equipment line was, you know, obviously a little light relative to our expectations. I think you referenced that yourself. You know, was that really just a kind—Is there a timing issue? What kind of drove that? How would we think about that with regards to, you know, is there any chance that some of that was just delayed stuff that would find its way in the fourth quarter? I think we all understand that the outlook for 27 seems okay, but just kind of, you know, maybe some color into what happened in the third quarter and what maybe that means for the near term in terms of equipment sales.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Ted, just to point out, we were up year over year in the third quarter by something to the tune of $10 million. And so we were relatively pleased with the quarter in construction. There wouldn’t have been any sort of timing issues there. You know, there is this aspect of some large snow deals that sometimes can drop in late Q3 or early Q4, and so that can play with it a little bit, but I wouldn’t say there’s any delays or anything happening there.

It’s fairly normal course. And, you know, as Ryan mentioned, the industry’s up about 5% this year. I think that’s, you know, 5% to 10% is where some of the larger OEMs that have reported already are expecting the North American market to come out at. And that’s kind of where we expect our numbers to shake out as well, sort of.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

You know, holding share in a bigger marketplace here. So in my mind, it was a bit of a rinse-and-repeat quarter for construction versus any sort of disappointment. Maybe it’s just against my model. Sticking with construction: yesterday, CNH announced the steps it’s taking to divest itself of its construction business. I guess it’s a little early, but what would you think that might do with regards to the market and how you participate? I mean, it seems to me you have a CNH presence, but it’s not your primary plate.

But it just seems to me that with that kind of uncertainty, if I was a dealer, I might want to pull in my horns a little bit, given that kind of uncertainty with a transaction such as that. And perhaps that creates an opportunity for you. I mean, what would you think about that as a concept? Have you thought about what this means for the construction side of your business, if it means anything at all?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Yeah, this is Ryan. Ted, it’s a great question. It’s probably too early for us to read the tea leaves on how this might create some opportunity. You know, that could potentially create some horse trading of territories or APRs, or dealers reconsidering their product portfolio. And that type of volatility is certainly something that could create some opportunities for consolidation, but too early for us to really understand what it’s going to do in terms of the product portfolio or the strategy from the OEM.

We’re sort of waiting to hear exactly what the plan is. We understand that early on it’s going to be essentially a joint venture, that the existing dealer networks are going to remain intact. So over time, there’s going to probably be some movement, but too early to give you our strategy on that piece today. I would just add, Ted,

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

just to frame it for investors: it’s probably 5% or less of Alta’s total revenues that we’re talking about here, so relatively immaterial. The other thing I would add is I don’t think it was a secret that, at CNH/Case, they did this because they want to focus on agricultural equipment. And so having the asset with an OEM that’s serious about construction go globally, we think, can only be beneficial long term.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Okay, I have a couple more questions that I just want to make sure I don’t hog everything. So I’m going to step out. If there’s no more, I’d like to step back in. Thanks.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Thanks. Thank you.

Leah (Operator)

Your last question comes from the line of Stephen Hanson with Raymond James. Your line is currently unmuting. Please hold. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Stephen Hanson (Analyst at Raymond James)

Oh, yeah, thanks, guys. I just wanted to follow up on one of the earlier questions regarding the health of the dealer channel inventories and such. How do you feel about this sort of manifesting into better margin trajectory here going forward in ’27 from the construction standpoint? Thanks.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah. Hey, Steve, you know, we continue to drive forward. I think we were up 60 basis points again sequentially on the new and used construction equipment line. Some of this, too, is, as I mentioned, we’ve been mindful of the balance sheet, and so what that means is maybe taking some skinnier deals just to offload assets. So we continue to drive margin in the face of some of this disposition. I think there’s a little bit more room to go. I don’t know that it’s— you know, I think we’re working around the edges here a little bit, 50 basis points, 100 basis points from here.

But I do think there’s a little bit of room to go for Alta as things continue to normalize for us organically and as the market finalizes its stabilization and gets to equilibrium.

Stephen Hanson (Analyst at Raymond James)

Okay, that’s helpful, thanks. And just on the product support side, parts and service, how equipped are you there from a tech standpoint? Do you need to hire more? Are you actively recruiting today? Are you good with your existing base? Trying to get a sense for your ability to flex that part of the business up as the installed base grows here?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

I’ll take that. That’s more of a regional, even branch-level decision for us today. So there are branches that are understaffed, that have open reqs looking for technicians, and there are branches where we’ve been reducing headcount to make sure that we are meeting our productivity objectives because the work isn’t there. So, you know, the forecast for next year will be organic growth. It’ll be to add headcount of technicians. But that won’t be true across the board of every region or every branch.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

I think, you know, to add to that, Steve, we feel like we have found kind of a good, stable base here, and we’ve constantly got turnover and retirements and things like that. Our recruiting team does a great job of helping replenish. Ryan’s right, though: probably ’27, we want to get back to a little bit more headcount there and drive service.

Stephen Hanson (Analyst at Raymond James)

Okay, appreciate the time. Thank you.

Leah (Operator)

For our final question, we have Ted Jackson with Northland Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Thanks. So I wanted to jump back over into the rental business because the progress you’ve made there has just been substantial. If you look back, you were about $610 million of rental fleet in 1Q24. You’re down to basically $100 million from there, and you’ve essentially been able to keep your revenue from it flat. So your utilization rates have been coming up to levels that haven’t been seen for quite a bit of time. Are you done there? I mean, at this point, would we think about your fleet stabilizing around that $500 million mark and the focus really on just driving higher rates?

Or, as you think about it, now that you’ve gotten to this level and you have the business kind of, let’s say, where you want it to be and you understand it better, are you going to flip around and try to grow it?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Ted, I would appreciate you pointing that out. It’s been a lot of effort to kind of right-size this. What I would say is we ended the quarter at $509 million of gross book value of rental fleet. Based on where we know we’re at today, utilization-wise—and I think I mentioned this previously—we will find our KPIs here. In terms of utilization, we’re not quite there yet. And so, we have said we want to be sub-$500 million by year-end. I think we’re well on that path, and then we’ll revisit at year-end.

And, as I mentioned to somebody on the previous question about reinvesting, we’ll make those calls as we go through planning here, which we’re doing right now, and potentially add in places like Toronto and Chicago for strategic purposes. But we don’t think we’ve found the bottom yet. I think we’ve got a little bit of ways to go, and then we’ll make decisions on where to invest from there.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

Okay. And then on your service and parts revenue—it’s the best-margin business—and it’s growing, but it seems like it’s been a little lagging relative to at least my expectations. And I’m kind of curious, am I right with that and, if so, what’s pushing it, and what could you do to knock it up in terms of the trajectory?

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Ted, you know, this gets to the previous question on headcount. We have, specifically in our construction segment and then secondarily material handling, been laser-focused on technician profitability and utilization. And I would point you toward the gross margins and just nominal gross margin dollars versus top line in product support. If you look, I think we were up 250 basis points in the quarter on gross margin in service. That’s us getting the same amount of work done, relatively speaking, with fewer people.

And so as we work through optimizing the business, that’s what we’ve been focused on: not necessarily top-line growth, but getting as efficient as possible in our shops. A lot of that is strategic. As we mentioned, we hope to get back to growing headcount again and growing the top line as we head into ’27 and then beyond. But for now, ’26 is going to be a flattish type year and part of our optimization efforts.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

And then my final question, just jumping over onto the OPEX side: you guys have just run lean and mean. Your OPEX is basically flat—and if not down, actually—and the controls there have been phenomenal. I’m kind of curious, maybe a little color on how you’ve been able to do that and how you think about those expenses as we move forward.

Tony Koluchi (Chief Financial Officer)

I think, Ted, it’s a function of some very tangible reorganizations in certain geographies after a lot of M&A, where we are down administrative headcount. Some of this gets to what I was describing on the service side in terms of technician headcount. And so when you don’t have as many techs, you don’t have as many vehicles, which hit the OPEX line in terms of service vehicles and fuel and employee benefits, etc. When you’re running leaner in the rental department, things tend to lose pounds from an incremental-dollar perspective.

All those things are happening. And what I would say is we actually would have expected a little bit more. We’ve made note of our healthcare spend. We’re self-insured. We’re over budget, I would say, and over 2025’s performance, to the tune of several million dollars, where we think we actually could have done better on the OPEX line, and some of these efforts would have been even more meaningful. But it is what it is. That’s what’s going on in the OPEX line.

Ted Jackson (Analyst at Northland Securities)

All right. Thanks very much. Excited to see 2027.

Ryan Greenawalt (Chief Executive Officer)

Same here.

Leah (Operator)

There are no further questions at this time. This concludes today’s call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.

Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.